Israel Medical Association Journal

Recent publications based on newly available list of surgeries performed in Nazi concentration camps raised the question of motivation for thousands of procedures on internees incarcerated from occupied Europe. The performance of major surgeries would be suspicious in their intent, indicating, if not directly proving, their intention as an exercise for junior physicians or medical students. The concept of the Revier (infirmary) is discussed. The Revier (also known as Krankenrevier or infirmary) in Nazi concentrations camps was located next to the extermination unit. Procedures performed at the Revier were considered non-therapeutic, as the victims had a minimal chance of survival without appropriate postoperative facilities. A review of medical documents of major concentration camps (Auschwitz, Mauthausen, Gusen, Ebensee) indicates the criminal intention of the authorities. This unusual type of crime was raised in post-war trials, but no specific legal code was nominated.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery is a specialty that has an important place in the surgical field. Plastic surgeons cooperate with all surgical disciplines to solve complex multidisciplinary surgical cases. This issue of the Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) covers some of the groundbreaking treatments being performed by plastic surgeons in Israel.

The articles show the wide and complex range of issues where plastic surgery is needed, including hospital-based breast reconstructions, oncologic resections, and innovative lymphedema surgery, as well as aesthetic procedures. The efforts of plastic surgeons have been especially highlighted due to the Iron Swords war, which started on 7 October 2023. Injuries included complex burns and amputations that required attention under fire. In addition, advances were achieved through cutting‑edge reconstructive microsurgical traumatic solutions. Together, these articles highlight how Israeli teams have leveraged experience in trauma, high‑volume civilian and military caseloads and innovative inspirations that have generated knowledge that may be broadly applicable to surgeons worldwide.

During these challenging times, following the October 7th terrorist attacks and the ongoing Iron Swords war, there is a greater need to strengthen the Israeli Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery. Prof. Josef Haik, chair of the Israeli Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, leads this effort. In addition, it is vital to highlight Israel's contributions to the global Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery community and to encourage collaboration with the nursing division for plastic surgery and burns. Our department is involved in presenting our findings and collaborating with colleagues. In this article, we outlined five main topics: the role of plastic surgery in wartime, reconstructive plastic surgery, aesthetic plastic surgery, microsurgery, and innovation in plastic surgery.

Background: The incidence of autologous breast reconstruction has been steadily increasing in recent years. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is considered the gold standard for breast reconstruction despite its demanding technical expertise, time intensiveness, and rigorous postoperative monitoring.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 102 DIEP flaps utilized for breast reconstruction in 70 patients treated at private clinics between 2013 and 2024. All surgeries were performed by a single, experienced surgeon.

Results: The mean age at surgery was 42.2 ± 8 years. Immediate reconstructions were conducted in 34 patients (48%); 46% of patients had prior radiation therapy. Only one patient received adjuvant radiation therapy. Free DIEP flaps vascularized by one (53%), two (32%), or three (10%) perforators were preferentially anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels. One patient underwent a muscle-sparing procedure due to the absence of available perforators. Total flap failure occurred in four cases (3.9%), three occurred as a unilateral loss in patients who underwent bilateral reconstruction. Postoperative revisions of the microvascular anastomosis were performed in three patients, with successful flap salvage in two (67%). Fat necrosis was diagnosed in 26 breasts (25%), only a minority of cases required follow-up surgery. All patients were managed completely in a private clinic, with none requiring hospitalization in the public system.

Conclusions: Free DIEP flap breast reconstruction necessitates meticulous surgical planning, a well-coordinated surgical team, and close postoperative monitoring. Nevertheless, this surgery can be safely and effectively performed in a private clinic setting, with complication rates comparable to that of the public setting.

Background: Abdominoplasties are among the most common procedures in aesthetic plastic surgery. The target audience are patients after massive weight loss who are left with excess skin and post-partum patients. Due to the efficacy of abdominoplasties in improving the abdominal contour, it became a mainstay procedure in plastic surgery. Claims have been made that abdominal surgeries can be safely combined with breast surgeries, and thereby decrease the risk associated with anesthesia for two separate procedures as well as the recovery period. The benefits of the combined procedures led to a surplus of patients seeking consultations.

Objectives: To examine the safety of the mommy makeover procedure compared to sole abdominoplasty.

Methods: Patients who previously underwent abdominoplasty by the senior author were divided into two groups based on whether breast surgery was performed in addition to the abdominoplasty. Groups were compared based on demographical, clinical, and surgical variables.

Results: The study cohort included 726 patients, of whom 15% underwent "Mommy-makeovers". Groups differed only in liposuction volume, resection weight and number of drains. Regarding surgical outcomes, surgical site infections were seen at a greater rate in the isolated abdominoplasty procedure. Further analyses accounting for potential confounders found no difference between the groups in terms of adverse events.

Conclusions: Mommy makeovers do not display a safety concern when compared to isolated abdominoplasties. Surgeons must consider various patient characteristics to ensure optimal results.

In the 1950s, ionizing radiation to the scalp was commonly used in Israel as a treatment for tinea capitis. Decades later, epidemiological studies identified an increased incidence of head and neck malignancies, particularly basal cell carcinoma, as well as intracranial tumors such as meningiomas among individuals who underwent this therapy in childhood. In addition to the oncologic risk, irradiated scalp skin presents significant reconstructive challenges due to chronic skin atrophy, hypovascularity, fibrosis, and impaired wound healing. In this study, we present our clinical experience with a modified, skin-sparing surgical protocol for managing reconstruction post excision of non-melanoma skin cancer of the scalp in patients previously irradiated for tinea capitis. The surgical strategy is tailored according to lesion size, depth, periosteal involvement, and scalp tissue quality. It incorporates components of the reconstructive ladder as appropriate. We present three representative cases highlighting key surgical challenges and considerations in this complex population.

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamin, 5-HT) is a vital monoamine neurotransmitter that modulates various physiological processes. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are commonly used for the management of depressive disorders. Prolonged administration of SSRIs may lead to reduced platelet aggregability due to the depletion of serotonin stores within platelets. However, the association between chronic SSRI use and the risk of postoperative bleeding remains a topic of debate, with no standardized guidelines for managing this risk in the field of plastic surgery. This literature review and case report highlights the importance of considering chronic SSRI use as a potential risk factor for postoperative bleeding in plastic surgery patients. Standardized guidelines for handling postoperative bleeding risk in patients using SSRIs are crucial for ensuring optimal surgical outcomes and patient safety.

This special dermatology issue of IMAJ (June 2025) highlights cutting-edge research, innovative therapeutic approaches, and comprehensive reviews that contribute significantly to advancements in dermatologic practice. Key themes include novel genetic insights, innovative treatments for pigmentary disorders such as melasma, seasonal variations affecting diagnostic procedures, practical management strategies for psoriasis, sophisticated surgical techniques, microbiome research, and the potential of humanized mouse models in dermatological studies.

Mohs micrographic Surgery (MMS) is a specialized surgical technique for removal of skin tumors. It achieves the highest cure rates of any available treatment. At the same time, it spares healthy tissue and thus provides superior cosmetic and functional results. The technique is indicated mainly for tumors on the head and neck. Other bodily areas including the trunk and extremities have been found to be indications for MMS as well. These indications have been defined by a collaborative work of major dermatology and dermatologic surgery organizations. Knowledge of these indications, in particular on areas other than the head and neck, is prudent for appropriately managing these tumors.

The Nazi regime occupying Europe during World War II built a series of concentration camps for those opposing the regime, political and criminal adversaries, and eventually victims of the racial, Aryan policy. It was the suggestion of Germany's elite physician to the Schutzstaffel (SS), Reichfuehrer H.H. (Heinrich Luitpold Himmler), to use the available workforce in the camps, before their eventual liquidation [2,3]. What was the outcome?

The SS medical services in the Auschwitz concentration camp functioned based on two mutually exclusive principles. On the one hand, medical care was provided for the SS staff, and on the other hand, prisoners with contagious diseases or in the terminal stages of exhaustion were eliminated.

On 9 August 1938, prisoners from Dachau concentration camp near Munich were sent to the town of Mauthausen in Austria to begin building a new camp. The site was chosen because of the nearby granite quarry and its proximity to Linz [1,2].

Mauthausen initially served as a prison camp for common criminals, prostitutes, and other categories of incorrigible law offenders. However, on 8 May 1939, it was converted to a labor camp. Later, Mauthausen KL became a Nazi concentration camp on a hill above the market town of Mauthausen, approximately 20 kilometers from Linz. It was complemented with dozens of subcamps in the surrounding areas.

Background: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, locally aggressive, soft-tissue sarcoma. The treatment is surgical and includes wide local excision (WLE) or Mohs micrographic Surgery (MMS). There is no consensus regarding the preferred type of surgery.

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of the two types of surgery (WLE and MMS).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was based on the medical records of 59 patients with DFSP treated at Sheba Medical Center (using the WLE method) or Assuta Medical Center (using the MMS method) between 1995 and 2018. The data included demographics, clinical presentations, imaging, types of wound closures, pathological margin status, surgical defect sizes, recurrences, and follow-up.

Results: Of the 59 included patients, 18 (30.5%) underwent WLE and 41 (69.5%) underwent MMS. The mean age at diagnosis was 40.1 ± 14.4 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1.5:1. The main tumor location was the trunk (50% for WLE and 41.5% for MMS). The main type of closure for both procedures was primary closure. In 72.2% of WLE and 78.8% of MMS cases, the margins were free. The difference between the final surgical defect and the original tumor size was statistically significantly smaller in patients who underwent MMS. The median duration of follow-up was 6.6 years. There was no significant difference in the rate of recurrence.

Conclusions: MMS enables better tissue preservation and results in a minor surgical defect compared to WLE, with no difference in tumor recurrence between the two methods.

Background: One of the major causes of reversible visual impairment is a refractive error, which can be corrected through refractive surgery. Data regarding the outcomes and complications of these procedures exist; however, there is a notable gap in understanding the factors leading to patient rejection, particularly in diverse populations like Israel.

Objectives: To detect clinical risk factors of patients who intend to undergo LASIK procedure and to improve the conversion rates of LASIK procedure in this population.

Methods: The study included a retrospective analysis of patients who were rejected from having refractive surgery in two Enaim Refractive Surgery Centers: Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Comparisons between centers were conducted using the t-test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical data.

Results: Our study included 337 patients who were rejected from having refractive surgery, including 152 (45.1%) who were rejected permanently and 185 (54.9%) rejected temporarily. The most common reasons for permanent rejection were corneal irregularity (n=81, 53.3%), keratoconus (n=27, 17.8%), thin corneas (n=13, 8.6%), and amblyopia (n=10, 6.6%). The most common temporary reasons were unstable refraction (n=96, 51.9%), prolonged use of contact lenses (n=54, 29.2%), and corneal irregularity (n=16, 8.6%).

Conclusions: The leading permanent cause of rejection for refractive surgery was a corneal irregularity, whereas the primary temporary cause was unstable refraction. In a time of rapid technological advancements and growing demand for freedom from glasses, there is an increasing need for more informed and patient-focused refractive correction approaches.

Almost three-quarters of a century ago an American surgeon named Frederick Edward Mohs, had the idea of excising skin cancers and examining the margins before the closure of the surgical wound. In this manner he thought the patient would get better treatment with the best cosmetic result.

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in its present format has been used as a surgical method for treating skin cancers for the last 70 years. The method became popular with American dermatologists 54 years ago when the original Mohs technique was modified into its fresh tissue modality [2] and in the rest of the Western world and Israel more than 35 years ago. Variations of MMS started to appear and indications for surgery also expanded. At the beginning, MMS was indicated mainly for basal and squamous cell carcinomas–nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Knowledge has been collected and today the method is applicable for a variety of other skin cancers such as melanoma in situ, microcystic adnexal carcinoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), and other adnexal and spindle cell tumors. In this issue of the Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ), Landov and colleagues [3] showed the value of MMS for the treatment of DFSP.

Letter 1: "Not type 2" by Moti Ravid 

Letter 2: "Hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, and acute kidney injury: clues for the diagnosis of uroperitoneum in patients with new-onset ascites" by Zvi Ackerman and Samuel N. Heyman, 

Letter 3: "Surgery in Mauthausen Concentration Camp" by George M. Weisz