Israel Medical Association Journal

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health concern, ranking as the third most common cancer in the United States. Screening programs, especially colonoscopy, play a crucial role in preventing CRC by removing and detecting polyps or early-stage cancers. Despite inherent risks, colonoscopy's effectiveness in saving lives is significant. In this review, we analyzed the outcomes of screening colonoscopies in an asymptomatic population for 15 years, focusing on detection rates and complications. We compared the data with previous meta-analyzes to evaluate changes in efficacy and safety. We conducted a systematic search of medical literature databases (1 January 2012 to 31 December 2023) for English-language studies on CRC screening colonoscopy. Our inclusion criteria comprised complete articles with over 500 participants with extractable data and a focus on screening colonoscopy outcomes in average-risk populations. In total, 2,897,025 people were screened, most (99.6%) were asymptomatic and were an average-risk population. Colonoscopy was complete and reached the cecum in 97–99% of the procedures. CRC was found in 0.5% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.4–0.7%) of the participants. Advanced adenoma was found in 7.6% (95%CI 6.2–9.3%) of the cases. Complications were rare. Perforation developed in 0.022% of the cases and bleeding in 0.148%. Our findings exhibited a significant increase in the detection yield of adenomas and advanced adenomas with low complication rates, which shows that colonoscopy is feasible and suitable for screening for CRC in asymptomatic people.

Background: With age, colorectal cancer (CRC) prevalence rises. The elderly (> 75 years), and the very elderly (> 85 years) are especially vulnerable. The advantages of screening must be assessed in the context of diminished life span and co-morbidities.

Objective: To compare CRC findings in colonoscopies that were performed following a positive fecal occult blood test/fecal immunochemical test (FOBT/FIT) in both elderly and very elderly age groups with those of younger patients.

Methods: We identified colonoscopies conducted between 1998 and 2019 following a positive stool test for occult blood in asymptomatic individuals. A finding of malignancy was compared between the two patient age groups. Furthermore, a sub-analysis was performed for positive malignancy findings in FOBT/FIT among patients > 85 years compared to younger than < 75 years.

Results: We compared the colonoscopy findings in 10,472 patients: 40–75 years old (n=10,146) vs. 76–110 years old (n=326). There was no significant difference in prevalence of CRC detection rate between the groups following positive FOBT/FIT (2.1% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.47). Similar results for non-significant differences were obtained in the sub-analysis compared to malignancy detection rates in the very elderly 0% (n=0) vs. 2.1% for < 75 years old (n=18), P = 0.59.

Conclusions: Although the prevalence of CRC increases with age, no significant increase in the detection rate of CRC by FOBT was found in either the elderly or very elderly age groups. Screening colonoscopies in elderly patients should be performed only after careful consideration of potential benefits, risks, and patient preferences.