• IMA sites
  • IMAJ services
  • IMA journals
  • Follow us
  • Alternate Text Alternate Text
עמוד בית
Fri, 05.12.25

Search results


April 2025
Daniella Vronsky MD, Genady Drozdinsky MD, Irit Ayalon-Dangur MD, Ya'ara Leibovici Weissman MD, Noa Eliakim-Raz MD

Background: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients represent a particularly vulnerable group due to their reliance on immunosuppressive therapies. Previous studies indicated a mortality rate of 20%-30% among SOT recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). With the advent of the Omicron variant in November 2021, characterized by milder symptoms and lower mortality rates in the general population, safety measures relaxed, potentially impacting vulnerable populations like SOT recipients.

Objectives: To investigate mortality and morbidity among hospitalized SOT recipients with COVID-19 infection during the Omicron wave.

Methods: A retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study conducted at the Rabin Medical Center, Israel, spanned from November 2021 to June 2023. Adult SOT recipients hospitalized with COVID-19 were compared to matched controls.

Results: Among 139 hospitalized SOT recipients and 209 controls, SOT recipients hospitalized with COVID-19 displayed higher in-hospital mortality (19% vs. 11%) and 90-day all-cause mortality (30% vs. 17%). In addition, the 90-day readmission rate was significantly higher among SOT recipients (43% vs. 31%). Multivariable analysis confirmed these trends, with SOT recipients exhibiting increased risk for mortality, readmission, invasive ventilation, and intensive care unit admission.

Conclusions: The heightened vulnerability of hospitalized SOT recipients during the Omicron wave was characterized by higher mortality and readmission rates compared to matched controls. Despite the perceived milder nature of the Omicron variant, SOT recipients remain disproportionately affected. Continued vigilance and targeted interventions are necessary for this population including vaccinations and adherence to preventive measures. Investigating this population’s outcomes through the changing COVID-19 variants is still warranted.

September 2007
D. Tal, P. Gilbey, R. Bar and A. Shupak

Background: Seasickness is thought to result from conflicting inputs from the vestibular, visual and somatosensory systems. The otolithic organs, which are responsible for the sensation of linear acceleration and tilt, are important in the pathogenesis of seasickness. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials test is an objective evaluation of saccular function.

Objective: To examine whether saccular function is related to the pathogenesis of seasickness.

Methods: VEMP1 was performed in 10 subjects susceptible to seasickness and in 14 non-susceptible subjects.

Results: Bilateral VEMP responses were obtained in 7 (50%) of the non-susceptible subjects and 1 (10%) of the susceptible subjects. No differences were found between the groups in P13 and N23 wave latencies, amplitudes, N13-P23 inter-peak latencies, and peak-to-peak asymmetry ratios. More subjects in the susceptible group had asymmetry ratios > 35%.   

Conclusions: The attenuated saccular response might be explained in the context of the neural-mismatch theory and/or the subjective vertical theory, as reflecting an adaptation effort to sea conditions. A larger study is necessary to determine whether a statistically significant difference in VEMP responses exists between seasickness-susceptible and non-susceptible subjects.
 

September 2003
E.L. Shabtai, M. Ben-Haim, D. Rosin, J. Kuriansky, E. Gazit, A. Ayalon and M. Shabtai

Background: An organ sharing system should achieve fairness and optimal graft longevity. Balancing between social and utilitarian considerations is a sensitive ethical, public and medical issue that requires a means to examine the consequences of any allocation policy or planned changes thereof.

Objective: To evaluate the performance and applicability of a computerized simulation model by examining the impact of two opposing organ allocation policies (social or utilitarian) on predicted organ distribution regarding age, waiting time, recipient sensitization measured by panel reactive antibody level and overall donor-recipient tissue matching (measured by the number of HLA antigen mismatches).

Methods: Using a computerized simulation model, virtual donors and recipients were emulated and organs were allocated according to either social algorithms or utilitarian policies. The resulting number of HLA mismatches, PRA[1], age, and waiting time distributions were compared between allocation strategies.

Results: Simulating allocation of 7,000 organs to 17,000 candidate recipients and implementing social policies yielded donor-recipient compatibility comparable to utilitarian policies (0–1 mm: 19.4% vs. 28%) while allocating 66.7% of organs to long waiters (>48 months).

Conclusion: This computerized simulation model is a valuable tool for decision-makers establishing or modifying organ allocation policies.






[1] PRA = panel reactive antibody


Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any matter.
The IMA is not responsible for and expressly disclaims liability for damages of any kind arising from the use of or reliance on information contained within the site.
© All rights to information on this site are reserved and are the property of the Israeli Medical Association. Privacy policy

2 Twin Towers, 35 Jabotinsky, POB 4292, Ramat Gan 5251108 Israel