Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: National crises can significantly impact healthcare utilization patterns yet analyses of different types of crises are limited. While the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on emergency department (ED) utilization have been well-documented, the healthcare impact of the Israel–Hamas war, which began 7 October 2023, remains unexplored.

Objectives: To compare ED utilization patterns for non-traumatic low back pain (LBP) during two distinct national crises.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study analyzing ED visits for non-traumatic LBP at our medical center. We compared ED utilization patterns, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and surgical rates during 60 days before and after two distinct dates: 7 October 2023 and 19 March 2020 (the start of the COVID-19 lockdown). Statistical analysis included independent t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables.

Results: Following 7 October, ED visits decreased by 28.6% (504 to 360). Mean VAS scores and surgery rates showed a non-significant increase from 5.5 ± 2.6 to 5.8 ± 2.4, and from 3.0% to 4.2%, respectively. During the COVID-19 lockdown, ED visits declined by 44.2%, with non-significant changes in pain scores (6.0 ± 3.0 to 5.5 ± 2.9) and surgical rates (3.5% to 2.5%).

Conclusions: Both events led to significant reductions in ED utilization for non-traumatic LBP, despite the heightened risk factors. Surgical rates remained stable, yet many symptomatic patients may have foregone adequate care. These findings underscore the need for resilient, crisis-specific emergency preparedness strategies to ensure continued access to care.

Kidney involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is common with altered kidney function present in approximately half of the patients [1]. Scleroderma renal crisis (SRC), the most severe kidney manifestation, occurs in about 20% of patients with this autoimmune disorder [1]. SRC mainly affects patients with the diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) subtype of the disease, and particularly in those who are seropositive to anti RNA polymerase III antibodies [2]. In recent years, the prevalence of SRC has decreased following the initiation of medication therapy with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACE-i). Previously, SRC mortality rates were as high as 78%. Contemporary studies in the post-ACE-i era suggest lower rates, with mortality rate ranging from 30% to 36% [3]. Nevertheless, progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is evident and may require renal replacement therapies (RRTs). While renal transplant rates in SSc have increased, they constitute a small proportion of SSc-SRC patients (3–8%) and SSc-ESRD patients (4–17%).

In the acute settings of generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) treatment options include plasma exchange (PLEX), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and pyridostigmines. A thymoma is associated with the disease in up to 20% of cases [1,2].

In cases where a thymoma is detected, surgical treatment to remove the tumor is recommended in certain age groups. At present, there are no clear guidelines regarding the optimal time to perform thymectomy after diagnosis of acute crisis or from the last treatment to thymectomy. Treatment is at the clinician's discretion.

This focus article is a theoretical reflection on the ethics of allocating respirators to patients in circumstances of shortage, especially during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Israel. In this article, respirators are placeholders for similar life-saving modalities in short supply, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation machines and intensive care unit beds.

In the article, I propose a system of triage for circumstances of scarcity of respirators. The system separates the hopeless from the curable, granting every treatable person a real chance of cure. The scarcity situation eliminates excesses of medicine, and then allocates respirators by a single scale, combining an evidence-based scoring system with risk-proportionate lottery.

The triage proposed embodies continuity and consistency with the healthcare practices in ordinary times. Yet, I suggest two regulatory modifications: one in relation to expediting review of novel and makeshift solutions and the second in relation to mandatory retrospective research on all relevant medical data and standard (as opposed to experimental) interventions that are influenced by the triage

Background: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) crisis has affected how hospitals work and has had an effect on orthopedic surgery.

Objectives: To compare patient management and low-energy and high-energy trauma treatment at two orthopedic trauma units during the COVID-19 crisis and to clarify resource demands and preparedness in orthopedic clinics during the state of emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at two orthopedic trauma units from 14 March 2019 to 14 April 2019 and from 14 March 2020 to 14 April 2020.

Results: The proportion of patients admitted in the multi-trauma orthopedic unit decreased by one-third, the mean time interval from admission to surgery significantly decreased, and the number of surgeries and mean length of stay in hospital decreased in 2020 compared to the same test period in 2019. In the orthopedic trauma unit, the number of patients and surgeries also decreased.

Conclusions: Our study highlights changes in orthopedic injury characteristics in two orthopedic units during the COVID-19 crisis in Latvia and compares these changes to data from the same time period one year earlier.