IMAJ | volume 27
Journal 11, November 2025
pages: 691-697
1 Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
2 Department of Management, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
3 Department of Pediatrics, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel
4 Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Summary
Background:
Pediatric urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a significant health concern, with rising antibiotic resistance complicating treatment decisions. We investigated pathogen distribution, antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and the cost-effectiveness of treatment options among hospitalized children at a tertiary medical center in Israel.
Objectives:
To assess antibiotic susceptibility patterns of UTI pathogens in hospitalized children and evaluate cost-effective alternatives to gentamicin.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis of 16
49 pediatric UTI cases (January 2010–May 2022) at Galilee Medical Center examined patient demographics, urine culture results, and antibiotic susceptibility. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), based on susceptibility rates from the study and antibiotic costs from the Israel Ministry of Health, with gentamicin as the comparator.
Results:
Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen (63.7%). High susceptibility rates were observed for carbapenems and amikacin (> 99%), with lower rates for gentamicin (91.7%) and ceftriaxone (87.6%). Treatment costs ranged from US$2.54 (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) to US$307.80 (ertapenem). Fosfomycin demonstrated higher susceptibility than gentamicin (94.2% vs 91.7%) and lower cost (US$3.77 vs US$8.05), dominating gentamicin in cost-effectiveness analysis. Piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftriaxone were dominated by gentamicin in terms of cost-effectiveness.
Conclusions:
E. coli was the predominant pathogen in pediatric UTIs among hospitalized children. Carbapenems and amikacin showed high susceptibility but were costly. Fosfomycin demonstrated high susceptibility, favorable cost-effectiveness, and the advantage of oral administration, making it a promising option for empiric treatment. Empiric antibiotic selection should integrate susceptibility patterns, clinical context, and economic considerations.