Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: Elbow range of motion (ROM) is commonly assessed during initial evaluation and follow-up. While goniometry is considered the current gold standard, previous studies have raised concerns regarding its user dependence and measurement consistency.

Objective: To evaluate whether smartphone application-based elbow ROM measurements are comparable to visual estimation and goniometry in patients following elbow trauma.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 18 patients with elbow injuries. Demographic and medical data were collected. Maximal flexion-extension active ROM was measured by goniometry, smartphone application, and visual estimation by orthopedic surgeons. Measurements were compared to determine agreement and accuracy among different modalities.

Results: Eighteen patients with elbow injuries were included. Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent across all rater groups (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.78–0.93). Using paired t-tests with Bonferroni correction, only one attending surgeon showed a significant underestimation of extension compared to goniometry (16.9° vs. 22.5°, P < 0.05). No significant differences were found for residents, other attendings, or smartphone measurements in either extension or flexion (P > 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis revealed modest mean bias within ± 6° for all methods, although limits of agreement were wide (up to ± 20–30°). Smartphone-based measurements demonstrated significantly higher and less variable Pearson correlation coefficients with goniometry compared to surgeon visual estimations (0.91–0.95 vs. 0.81–0.93, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Smartphone-based elbow ROM measurements were statistically comparable to goniometry and demonstrated superior correlation and accuracy relative to clinical visual assessments. These findings support the integration of smartphone tools in the clinical setting.

Background: Delays in diagnosis and inadequate treatment of acute scaphoid fractures can lead to non-unions, presenting surgeons with unique challenges regarding optimal management.

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome of scaphoid non-unions treated with percutaneous screw fixation.

Methods: The study group comprised12 patients with scaphoid non-unions of an average duration of 8.7 months. There were 11 males and 1 female with an average age of 24 years (range 14–47 years). All patients were initially treated with percutaneous screw fixation without bone grafting. A volar percutaneous approach was used in eight patients and a dorsal percutaneous approach in four. Wrist range of motion (ROM) and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaires were used to assess clinical outcomes. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess the fracture union, carpal alignment and screw position.

Results: Eleven of the 12 (92%) fractures united successfully with no additional procedures. These fractures achieved radiographic union at an average of 4 months. One patient with sickle cell anemia required revision fixation, which consisted of repeat percutaneous fixation and bone grafting. In this patient his non-union healed 3 months after the revision procedure. The average DASH score at final follow-up was 6 (range 0–16). Average wrist ROM was extension of 66 degrees (range 50–80) and flexion 71 degrees (range 55–90). None of the patients showed radiographic signs of osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis of the scaphoid, or hardware-related complications.

Conclusions: For scaphoid waist nonunions without collapse, percutaneous fixation without supplementary bone grafting provides satisfactory results with a high union rate, early return of function and minimal complications.