Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Inappropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy leads to poor outcomes.

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist intervention on the appropriateness of antibiotic treatment in patients hospitalized with bacteremia.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at the Soroka Medical Center in Israel. The intervention was implemented starting in July 2018. We compared 170 patients who received pharmacist intervention (August 2018 to June 2019) to 173 control patients (January 2017 to July 2018). The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate antibiotic choice and dosage.

Results: Pharmacist intervention significantly improved appropriate antibiotic dosing (97.6% vs. 91.3%, P = 0.011) and selection based on pathogen sensitivity (100% vs. 95.4%, P = 0.007). The most significant effect was observed in patients with intermediate renal function (CrCl 30–60 ml/min). Multivariate analysis confirmed pharmacist intervention as a strong predictor of appropriate treatment (odds ratio 5.00, 95% confidence interval 1.64–15.25, P = 0.005). The intervention group had longer hospital stays (median 15 vs. 9 days, P < 0.001) and lower 7-day relapse rates (2.4% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.010).

Conclusions: Clinical pharmacist interventions significantly improved the appropriateness of antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia, particularly in those with intermediate renal function. Despite longer hospital stays, the intervention group had lower early relapse rates than the control group. These findings support the integration of clinical pharmacists into antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have significantly transformed anticoagulant therapy, improving effectiveness, safety, and convenience in managing thromboembolic conditions. However, concerns persist regarding drug-related problems (DRPs) associated with DOACs, necessitating the establishment of multidisciplinary antithrombotic stewardship programs to optimize the selection, dosing, and monitoring of DOACs.

Objectives: To evaluate the incidence and types of DRPs associated with DOACs, the frequency of clinical pharmacist consultations, the acceptance rates of the clinical pharmacist recommendations, and physicians' adherence to appropriate DOACs prescribing practices.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted over 4 months in the internal medicine departments at Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Israel. The study included patients aged 18 years and older who were prescribed DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran). Data on patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected from electronic medical records. A clinical pharmacist reviewed and reassessed the appropriateness of DOAC prescribing.

Results: During the study period, 415 patients receiving DOACs were identified. Among them, 28.4% had inappropriate DOAC prescriptions leading to 128 recommended interventions. The most common DRP was underdosing (29.7%) followed by unjustified antiplatelet use (26.6%). Clinical pharmacists performed 85.9% of the interventions, with a physician acceptance rate of 72.7%. Patients with inappropriate DOAC prescriptions exhibited increased trends in thromboembolic events and in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions: Despite over a decade of clinical experience with DOACs, DRPs remain a significant challenge. Implementing antithrombotic stewardship programs is critical for optimizing DOACs use, reducing DRPs, and enhancing patient safety.