Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have significantly transformed anticoagulant therapy, improving effectiveness, safety, and convenience in managing thromboembolic conditions. However, concerns persist regarding drug-related problems (DRPs) associated with DOACs, necessitating the establishment of multidisciplinary antithrombotic stewardship programs to optimize the selection, dosing, and monitoring of DOACs.

Objectives: To evaluate the incidence and types of DRPs associated with DOACs, the frequency of clinical pharmacist consultations, the acceptance rates of the clinical pharmacist recommendations, and physicians' adherence to appropriate DOACs prescribing practices.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted over 4 months in the internal medicine departments at Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Israel. The study included patients aged 18 years and older who were prescribed DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran). Data on patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected from electronic medical records. A clinical pharmacist reviewed and reassessed the appropriateness of DOAC prescribing.

Results: During the study period, 415 patients receiving DOACs were identified. Among them, 28.4% had inappropriate DOAC prescriptions leading to 128 recommended interventions. The most common DRP was underdosing (29.7%) followed by unjustified antiplatelet use (26.6%). Clinical pharmacists performed 85.9% of the interventions, with a physician acceptance rate of 72.7%. Patients with inappropriate DOAC prescriptions exhibited increased trends in thromboembolic events and in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions: Despite over a decade of clinical experience with DOACs, DRPs remain a significant challenge. Implementing antithrombotic stewardship programs is critical for optimizing DOACs use, reducing DRPs, and enhancing patient safety.

Background: Abdominoplasties are among the most common procedures in aesthetic plastic surgery. The target audience are patients after massive weight loss who are left with excess skin and post-partum patients. Due to the efficacy of abdominoplasties in improving the abdominal contour, it became a mainstay procedure in plastic surgery. Claims have been made that abdominal surgeries can be safely combined with breast surgeries, and thereby decrease the risk associated with anesthesia for two separate procedures as well as the recovery period. The benefits of the combined procedures led to a surplus of patients seeking consultations.

Objectives: To examine the safety of the mommy makeover procedure compared to sole abdominoplasty.

Methods: Patients who previously underwent abdominoplasty by the senior author were divided into two groups based on whether breast surgery was performed in addition to the abdominoplasty. Groups were compared based on demographical, clinical, and surgical variables.

Results: The study cohort included 726 patients, of whom 15% underwent "Mommy-makeovers". Groups differed only in liposuction volume, resection weight and number of drains. Regarding surgical outcomes, surgical site infections were seen at a greater rate in the isolated abdominoplasty procedure. Further analyses accounting for potential confounders found no difference between the groups in terms of adverse events.

Conclusions: Mommy makeovers do not display a safety concern when compared to isolated abdominoplasties. Surgeons must consider various patient characteristics to ensure optimal results.

Background: Admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) is an objective marker of severe maternal morbidity (SMM).

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of obstetric ICU admissions in one medical center in Israel and to characterize this population.

Methods: In this retrospective study the files of women coded for pregnancy, birth, or the perinatal period and admission to the ICU were pulled for data extraction (2005–2013).

Results: During the study period, 111 women were admitted to the ICU among 120,279 women who delivered babies (0.09%). Their average age was 30 ± 6 years, most were multigravida, a few had undergone fertility treatments, and only 27% had complicated previous pregnancies. Most pregnancies (71.2%) were uneventful prior to admission. ICU admissions were divided equally between direct (usually hemorrhage) and indirect (usually cardiac disease) obstetric causes.

Conclusions: The indications for obstetrics ICU admission correlated with the proximate causes of maternal arrest observed worldwide. While obstetric hemorrhage is often unpredictable, deterioration of heart disease is foreseeable. Attention should be directed specifically toward improving the diagnosis and treatment of maternal heart disease during pregnancy in Israel.

Background: Falls are a common problem among hospitalized patients, having a significant impact on quality of life and resource utilization.

Objectives: To develop and validate a fall-risk assessment tool for patients hospitalized in the department of medicine that will combine simplicity with adequate accuracy for routine use.

Methods: This observational cohort study was conducted on the medical wards of an urban tertiary teaching hospital, and included all patients who fell in the medical wards during a 1 year period (n=140) compared to other hospitalized patients.

Results: Significant correlates of falls were previous falls, impairing medical conditions, impaired mobility, and altered mental state. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, only previous falls (odds ratio 3.8 with 95% confidence interval 2.65–5.45, P < 0.0001) and acute impairing medical conditions (OR[1] 1.56, CI[2] 1.06–2.29, P < 0.05) correlated independently with a higher risk for falls. Impaired mobility retained an OR of 1.46 (CI 0.95–2.24, P = 0.084). Accordingly, defining patients with either a history of previous falls or both acute impairing medical state and impaired mobility as fall-prone patients provided a sensitivity and specificity of 67% and 63%, respectively. In a subsequent prospective validation trial on 88 patients who fell during hospitalization and 436 controls, the sensitivity and specificity of this fall-risk grouping were 64% and 68% respectively.

Conclusions: Our new simple and easy-to-use fall-risk assessment tool identified most of the fall-prone patients. These findings suggest that using this tool may enable us to prevent two-thirds of falls on the medical ward by providing effective fall-prevention facilities to only one-third of the patients.