Israel Medical Association Journal

Nail psoriasis (NP) is a common manifestation of psoriasis, affecting up to 80–90% of patients with psoriatic arthritis and up to 60% of those with cutaneous psoriasis. Isolated NP also occurs in 5–10% of cases. It significantly impacts quality of life and may indicate or precede psoriatic arthritis. In this review, we summarized the clinical features of NP, highlighting patterns of matrix and nail bed involvement, and discussed differential diagnosis with onychomycosis. We outlined current topical, intralesional, systemic, and non-pharmacological treatment options, and proposed an evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management.

Psoriasis is a chronic immuno-inflammatory skin disorder characterized by rapid keratinocyte proliferation, forming thick, red patches with silvery scales. It affects 2–3% of the population, impacting skin, nails, and joints. Pathogenesis involves genetic, environmental, and immunological factors [1]. Triggers such as infections (especially Streptococcus), skin injuries, medications, stress, and alcohol can initiate or worsen the condition [1]. Psoriasis may follow a stable course or present in cycles of flare-ups and remissions. Skin involvement may manifest in any body area but is most common on the knees, elbows, trunk, and scalp [1]. Nail involvement appears in up to 60% of those with cutaneous psoriasis and 80% of those with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), with an 80–90% lifetime incidence [2,3]. Isolated nail psoriasis (NP), defined as nail changes without cutaneous psoriasis or with limited body surface involvement (< 5%), occurs in 5–10% of patients [4,5].

Extremely preterm infants are at high risk for mortality and morbidity including neurodevelopmental impairment from invasive Candida infections. Prophylactic antifungal therapy has been shown to reduce both colonization and invasive candidemia in high-risk preterm infants. Prophylactic treatment should be started in the first 48 to 72 hours after birth to extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants (weighing ≤ 1000 grams at birth) or below 27 weeks gestation age with risk factors, or in any NICU with moderate (5–10%) or high (≥ 10%) rates of invasive candidiasis. Studies demonstrated the benefits of fluconazole prophylaxis regarding its safety of the short-term and long-term without the development of fungal resistance. Empiric antifungal therapy may lower mortality and improve outcomes

Background: Invasive fungal infections by Mucorales or Aspergillus spp. are lethal infections in immune compromised patients. For these infections a multimodal approach is required. One potential tool for treating these infections is hyperbaric oxygen.

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical course and utility of hyperbaric oxygen in patients with invasive fungal infections by Mucorales or Aspergillus spp.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 14 patients treated with HBO[1] as part of their multimodal therapy over a 12 year period.

Results: Most patients had significant immune suppression due to either drug treatment or their underlying disorder. Thirteen of the 14 underwent surgery as part of the treatment and all were receiving antifungal therapy while treated with the hyperbaric oxygen. The number of HBO sessions ranged between 1 and 44. Seven of the patients survived the infection. No patient developed complications due to HBO therapy.

Conclusions: HBO is a potentially significant adjunct in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Evidence on its usefulness as a standard of care in these infections is still lacking. Since it will be difficult to generate conclusive data regarding the importance of HBO in these infections, the value of HBO in these patients should be considered on an individual basis.