Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: The management of symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) remains a surgical challenge.

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) in patients with symptomatic AAA.

Methods: Patients treated for symptomatic AAA between April 2020 and April 2025 were retrospectively analyzed, comparing perioperative mortality and major adverse events between EVAR and OSR.

Results: A total of 494 AAA patients were identified, 49 (9.9%) were symptomatic (40 [81.6%] EVAR group, 9 [18.4%] OSR group). Patients undergoing OSR had a higher rate of juxtarenal involvement (OSR 6/9 [66.7%] vs. EVAR 3/40 [7.5%]; P < 0.001). Any signs of rupture were more prevalent in the EVAR group (27/40 [67.5%] vs. OSR 2/9 [22.2%]; P = 0.013). Technical success was achieved in 83.7% (n=41/49). In-hospital mortality was 22.4% (n=11/49), with no difference between groups (EVAR 9/40 [22.5%] vs. OSR 2/9 [22.2%]; P = 0.986). At logistic regression analysis, open repair was associated with a significantly higher risk of major complications (odds ratio [OR] 16.9, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.79–158.3, P = 0.013), and a shock index > 0.9 remained an independent predictor of intra-hospital mortality (OR 372.5, 95%CI 1.58-87889.4, P = 0.034). During a mean follow-up of 28.8 ± 18.6 months, late mortality was 18.4% (n=7/38). Estimated survival analysis over 60 months did not demonstrate a significant difference between groups (log-rank test, P = 0.317).

Conclusions: Both EVAR and OSR yield satisfactory technical outcomes. Hemodynamic instability at presentation remains a critical predictor of mortality.

Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is associated with decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Objectives: To report the outcomes of EVAR among patients older than 80 years of age.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed patients older than 80 years of age who underwent elective EVAR at our institution between 2007 and 2017. The demographics, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term results are reported.

Results: During the study period, 444 patients underwent elective EVAR for AAAs. Among them 128 patients (29%) were > 80 years of age. Mean age was 84 ± 3.4 (range 80–96) years, and 110 patients (86%) were male. The EVAR was technically successful in 127 patients (99%) and there were intraoperative mortalities. Within 30 days of the surgery, nine patients (7%) died. Major and minor adverse events occurred in 26 (20%) and 59 (46%) patients, respectively. Factors associated with increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality included chronic kidney disease, peripheral artery disease, and the existence of three or more co-morbidities.

Conclusions: EVAR in the elderly can be performed with a high rate of success; however, it is associated with a substantial rate of morbidity and mortality, particularly when patients present with multiple co-morbidities. When performing EVAR in this population group, the risk of rupture must be considered opposed to the life expectancy of these patients and the risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality.