• IMA sites
  • IMAJ services
  • IMA journals
  • Follow us
  • Alternate Text Alternate Text
עמוד בית
Sat, 14.03.26

Search results


March 2026
Fadi Younis MD, Erez Scapa MD, Mati Shnell MD, Iddo Bar Yishay MD, Einat Ritter MD, Niv Zmora MD, Nir Bar MD, Nathaniel Aviv Cohen MD, Erwin Santo MD, Oren Shibolet MD, Adam Philips MD, Dana Ben-Ami Shor MD

Background: Prophylactic intravenous antibiotics are not routinely administered prior to direct peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy. The frequency of post-procedure bacteremia has not been well studied.

Objectives: To evaluate the risk of bacteremia following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with cholangiopancreatoscopy. To assess the prevalence of other infectious complications and the effect of real-life practices regarding prophylactic antibiotic administration.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on consecutive patients (2016–2022) who underwent cholangiopancreatoscopy using the single-operator SpyGlass System (Boston Scientific Corporation, USA). Prophylactic antibiotic treatment was administered based on clinical discretion. Demographic and clinical data, including procedure indication, procedure reports, blood culture results, pre- and post-procedure antibiotic treatment, hospital length, mortality, and infectious and non-infectious complications, were collected.

Results: Our single-center cohort included 75 patients who underwent ERCP with direct cholangiopancreatoscopy. We involved 63 patients in the analysis. In 17/63 patients (27%), post-procedural blood cultures were drawn based on clinical suspicion of infection. Positive cultures were found in 4/17 (23.5%) of all cultures and 4/63 (6.3%) of the entire cohort; 2/63 (3.2%) had clinically significant bacteremia. Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered to 35 patients (55.6%), with no evidence of significant reduction in bacteremia, cholangitis, hospitalization length, or mortality rates when compared to patients who did not receive prophylactic antibiotics (P > 0.05). Post-procedural cholangitis was observed in 5/63 patients (7.9%). There were no cases of acute cholecystitis or liver abscess.

Conclusions: The prevalence of bacteremia and cholangitis following ERCP with direct cholangiopancreatoscopy was 6.3% and 7.9%, respectively. Prophylactic antibiotics did not reduce post-procedural infectious adverse events.

July 2015
Igor Jeroukhimov MD, Itai Zoarets MD, Itay Wiser MD, Zahar Shapira MD, Dov Abramovich MD, Vladimir Nesterenko MD and Ariel Halevy MD

Background: Trauma patients diagnosed with pancreatic duct injury (PDI) have a high complication rate and prolonged hospital stay. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of PDI remains unclear. During the last decade, our trauma unit incorporated ERCP into the management protocol for suspected PDI cases. 

Objectives: To determine whether ERCP is a sensitive tool to detect PDI. 

Methods: This retrospective trauma patient series study assessed the diagnostic yield of ERCP in trauma cases with suspected PDI on computed tomography (CT) or intraoperatively. Between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2011, 13 patients admitted to our medical center underwent ERCP for suspected PDI. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), time from injury to ERCP, and ERCP-related complications were documented and assessed. 

Results: Of the 13 patients included in the analysis, 8 stable patients with suspected PDI on CT had no leak from the main pancreatic duct on ERCP. Two of them underwent surgery for suspected pancreatic transection. ERCP confirmed a main pancreatic duct leak in three patients. Two patients underwent ERCP for suspected PDI after “damage control” surgery. No leak from the pancreatic ducts was diagnosed. No pancreas-related complications or ERCP-related complications were observed.

Conclusions: ERCP is a sensitive and relatively safe tool for the diagnosis of PDI, and its use might prevent unnecessary surgical interventions in selected trauma cases.

 

December 2002
June 2002
Ron Reshef, MD, Wisam Sbeit, MD and Jesse Lachter, MD
Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any matter.
The IMA is not responsible for and expressly disclaims liability for damages of any kind arising from the use of or reliance on information contained within the site.
© All rights to information on this site are reserved and are the property of the Israeli Medical Association. Privacy policy

2 Twin Towers, 35 Jabotinsky, POB 4292, Ramat Gan 5251108 Israel