Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: Decompression sickness (DCS) is a clinical syndrome caused by a substantial reduction in barometric pressure. DCS is more common among divers but may also occur during flight or altitude chamber (hypobaric chamber) training. DCS is classified according to symptoms as either Type 1 (musculoskeletal and skin involvement) or Type 2 (neurological and pulmonary involvement). DCS may be life threatening and often necessitates treatment with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT).

Objectives: To examine the risk for altitude decompression sickness (ADCS) in altitude chamber training and to compare ADCS symptoms and treatment to those of DCS in divers (DDCS).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included all cases of ADCS in the Israeli Air Force between 2015 to 2022. We collected demographic, flight platform, altitude chamber training, clinical manifestations, and treatment data. Data regarding DDCS was obtained via a literature review.

Results: There were 2279 altitude chamber trainees and aviation physiology instructors. Of these, 11 presented ADCS, leading to a calculated ADCS risk of 0.5%. An additional four cases were reported following combat flights. Musculoskeletal involvement was the most common symptom in both DDCS and ADCS. A shorter HBOT protocol was used in 53% of the ADCS cases but only in 30% of the DDCS cases.

Conclusions: Overall, ADCS is a rare event, occurring in less than 1% of altitude chamber trainees. The common manifestation is of musculoskeletal involvement, and the mainstay of treatment remains HBOT.

Background: Cervical spinal surgery is considered safe and effective. One of the few specific complications of this procedure is C5 nerve root palsy. Expressed primarily by deltoid muscle and biceps brachii weakness, it is rare and has been related to nerve root traction or to ischemic spinal cord damage.

Objectives: To determine the clinical and epidemiological traits of C5 palsy. To determine whether C5 palsy occurs predominantly in one specific surgical approach compared to others.

Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent cervical spine surgery at our medical center during a consecutive 8-year period was conducted. The patient data were analyzed for demographics, diagnosis, and surgery type and approach, as well as for complications, with emphasis on the C5 nerve root palsy.

Results: The study group was comprised of 124 patients. Seven (5.6%) developed a C5 palsy following surgery. Interventions were either by anterior, by posterior or by a combined approach. Seven patients developed this complication. All of whom had myelopathy and were older males. A combined anteroposterior (5 patients) and posterior access (2 patients) were the only approaches that were associated with the C5 palsy. None of the patients who were operated via an anterior approach did develop this sequel.

Conclusions: The incidence of the C5 root palsy in our cohort reached 5.6%. Interventions performed through a combined anterior-posterior access in older myelopathic males, may carry the highest risk for this complication

Background: In patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy, orbital decompression surgery is indicated for compressive optic neuropathy, severe corneal exposure, or for cosmetic deformity due to proptosis. Traditionally this has been performed through a transantral approach, but the associated complication rate is high. More recently, endoscopic orbital decompression has been performed successfully with significantly fewer postoperative complications.

Objective: To report our experience of endoscopic orbital decompression in patients with severe Graves’ ophthalmopathy.

Methods: Three patients (five eyes) underwent endoscopic orbital decompression for Graves’ ophthalmopathy at Soroka Medical Center between the years 2000 and 2002. The indications for surgery were compressive optic neuropathy in three eyes, severe corneal exposure in one eye, and severe proptosis not cosmetically acceptable for the patient in one case. An intranasal endoscopic approach with the removal of the medial orbital wall and medial part of the floor was performed.

Results: In all five eyes an average reduction of 5 mm in proptosis was achieved. Soon after surgery, visual acuity improved in the three cases with compressive optic neuropathy, and exposure keratopathy and cosmetic appearance improved. The diplopia remained unchanged. No complications were observed postoperatively.

Conclusions: Endoscopic orbital decompression with removal of the medial orbital wall and medial part of the floor in the five reported eyes was an effective and safe procedure for treatment of severe Graves’ ophthalmopathy. A close collaboration between ophthalmologists and otorhinolaryngologists skilled in endoscopic sinus surgery is crucial for the correct management of these patients.