Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly occurring cancer worldwide. There are conflicting reports on whether colonoscopies performed during the morning shift have higher adenoma detection rates.

Objectives: To investigate the differences in polyp detection rate (PDR) in colonoscopies between morning and afternoon shifts.

Methods: In a retrospective, multicenter study involving a large cohort, we analyzed all colonoscopies conducted between 2016 and 2023 across seven endoscopy departments. The PDR was compared between morning and afternoon shifts.

Results: We included 368,997 colonoscopies: 213,795 (57.9%) performed during the morning shift and 155,202 (42.1%) during the afternoon shift. Patients undergoing colonoscopies during the morning shift were more frequently female (53.8% vs. 51%, P < 0.001) and tended to be older compared to those in the afternoon shift (average age of 56.97 ± 12.6 vs. 55.6 ± 12.9, P < 0.001). Colonoscopies conducted during the morning shift exhibited a higher cecum intubation rate (CIR) (96.7% vs. 95.6%, P < 0.001). During the morning shift, higher rates of PDR (32.9% vs. 29.9%, P < 0.001) were observed. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for other variables, age, male sex, polyp follow-up, fecal occult blood test, morning shift, familial history of CRC, and rectal bleeding demonstrated statistically significant associations (P < 0.001) for PDR.

Conclusions: Colonoscopies during the morning shift yielded a higher PDR and CIR than those in the afternoon. To improve this rate, endoscopists working the afternoon shift must be provided with the right conditions.

Background: Rare incidence cases are part of the routine work of pediatric surgeons. Cecal anomalies in children are an example of such cases.

Objectives: To describe the presentation, workup, management and outcome of rare cecal anomalies in children and to analyze the skills needed for their successful treatment.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all cases of cecal anomalies managed by the pediatric surgical service at a tertiary hospital from June 2017 to January 2020. Data regarding demographics, clinical presentation, radiological studies, surgical treatment, pathology, complications, and outcome were collected.

Results: Five cases of cecal anomalies were encountered over a period of 32 months, including a cecal volvulus, cecal duplication, cecal intussusception, and two cecal masses (one ulcerated lipoma and one polyp). All patients, except the patient with cecal duplication, presented acutely and were managed surgically. Long-term follow-up of 17–24 months was unremarkable in all cases.

Conclusions: A wide knowledge base, careful judgment, and creativity enable pediatric surgeons to successfully treat rare conditions such as rare cecal anomalies. These skills should be part of the education of pediatric surgery trainees.