• IMA sites
  • IMAJ services
  • IMA journals
  • Follow us
  • Alternate Text Alternate Text
עמוד בית
Sun, 22.06.25

Search results


February 2025
Dvir Shechter MD PhD, Elad Schiff MD, Nizar Elias MD, Sharon Gino-Moor MD, Sagi Gavrieli MA, Samuel Attias PhD, Ilana Levy Yurkovski MD

Background: Acute skin infections, like cellulitis or erysipelas, are common and respond well to antibiotic treatment. However, complete resolution of the inflammatory process is often slow and associated with prolonged pain and reduced mobility. Several studies have indicated that acupuncture may effectively treat inflammatory skin diseases.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture for treating cellulitis in patients hospitalized in internal medicine departments.

Methods: In this pilot randomized sham-controlled trial, patients hospitalized with cellulitis in internal medicine departments were randomized to acupuncture or sham acupuncture, in addition to standard care. The primary outcome was the degree of improvement in the cellulitis score at day 4 of hospitalization. Secondary endpoints included patient pain self-assessment and local and systemic inflammatory signs.

Results: The study comprised 29 patients; 15 treated with acupuncture, 14 by a sham procedure. At day 4, patients in the acupuncture arm had an improved cellulitis score (4.1 ± 2.8) compared with the sham-control group (7.9 ± 3.3, P = 0.003). Pain intensity based on the Visual Assessment Scale was lower in the acupuncture group 3.8 ± 2.7 vs. 6.3 ± 2.8; P = 0.023. There was no difference in the rate of leukocyte change. However, C-reactive protein significantly decreased to 27.0 ± 22.1 mg/L at day 4 following acupuncture compared to 63.9 ± 51.9 mg/L (P = 0.025).

Conclusions: In our pilot study, we found acupuncture to be efficacious as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of leg cellulitis. A large-scale trial on the effectiveness of acupuncture for skin infections is needed.

July 2010
May 2006
September 2005
M. Attia, J. Menhel, D. Alezra, R. Pffefer and R. Spiegelmann
July 2004
M. Attia, S. Harnof, N. Knoller, I. Shacked, Z. Zibly, L. Bedrin and G. Regev-Yochay
December 2003
Y. Schlesinger, S. Yahalom, D. Raveh, A.M. Yinnon, R. Segel, M. Erlichman, D. Attias and B. Rudensky

Background: Nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the community is being increasingly reported, but there is a general lack of data on MRSA[1] colonization in children in chronic care institutions and on colonization rates in Israeli children.

Objectives: To define the rate of MRSA nasal colonization in a generally healthy pediatric population in Jerusalem, to compare it with that of children in chronic care institutions, to define risk factors for colonization, and to compare community and hospital-acquired MRSA strains.

Methods: Anterior nares culture for the presence of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S. aureus was taken from 831 healthy children attending primary pediatric clinics or emergency department and 118 children hospitalized in three chronic care institutions in Jerusalem.


Results: Of the 831 healthy children, 195 (23.5%) were colonized with S. aureus, as compared to 43 of 118 (36.4%) chronically institutionalized children (P < 0.005). Five of the 195 S. aureus isolates from healthy children (2.6%) were MRSA, as compared to 9 of 43 (21%) from chronically institutionalized children (P < 0.001). Older age and a family member who is a healthcare worker were associated with S. aureus colonization in the population of healthy children, and older age was associated with MRSA colonization in the chronically institutionalized children. The antibiotic susceptibility pattern was similar for both groups, and pulsed field gel electrophoresis of the isolates showed a wide and random distribution in both groups.

Conclusions: MRSA colonization in the studied pediatric community in Jerusalem was very low, whereas that of patients hospitalized in chronic care institutions was significantly higher. In the small number of isolates detected, no significant differences were found in antibiotic susceptibility or PFGE[2] pattern between hospital-acquired and community-acquired strains.






[1] MRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus



[2] PFGE = pulsed field gel electrophoresis


Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any matter.
The IMA is not responsible for and expressly disclaims liability for damages of any kind arising from the use of or reliance on information contained within the site.
© All rights to information on this site are reserved and are the property of the Israeli Medical Association. Privacy policy

2 Twin Towers, 35 Jabotinsky, POB 4292, Ramat Gan 5251108 Israel