• IMA sites
  • IMAJ services
  • IMA journals
  • Follow us
  • Alternate Text Alternate Text
עמוד בית
Fri, 05.12.25

Search results


November 2025
Naama Farago MD, Samer Haddad MD, Gal Bachar MD, Naphtali Justman MD, Dana Vitner MD, Ron Beloosesky MD, Yuval Ginsberg MD, Yaniv Zipori MD, Zeev Weiner MD, Nizar Khatib MD

Background: Fetal macrosomia is a risk factor for operative vaginal delivery (VD), shoulder dystocia, obstructed labor, and cesarean section (CS). Induction of labor (IOL) may decrease these risks but also leads to longer labor, increasing the risk of CS. No data exist regarding the optimal method of IOL in macrosomic fetuses, and most studies are limited to the efficacy of medical induction.

Objective: To compare medical and mechanical IOL in macrocosmic fetuses.

Methods: This retrospective case-control study included pregnant women who underwent IOL and delivered macrosomic neonates at a tertiary center between 2010 and 2020.

Women with non-cephalic presentation, prior CS, and multiple pregnancies were excluded. The primary outcome was the mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes included neonatal and maternal complications.

Results: A total of 247 women were included in the study, 188 underwent cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) regimens and 59 with a double-balloon catheter. Higher rates of prior deliveries over 4000 grams and Oxytocin use during delivery were found in the mechanical induction group. No other clinically significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were identified. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of VD or CS between the groups. The indications for CS were similar. Maternal and neonatal secondary outcomes were comparable.

Conclusion: PGE2 vaginal regimens and double catheter balloons are safe and effective methods for cervical ripening during IOL in term pregnancies with macrosomic neonates. The choice of cervical ripening method did not impact the mode of delivery or maternal and neonatal outcomes.

October 2025
Raghda Zidan Sweid MD, Oshrat Elyaho MD, Zeev Weiner MD, Ido Solt MD

Background: The benefits of corticosteroid administration for suspected premature birth (PTB) are widely accepted. Although a single course of antenatal corticosteroids is generally considered to be safe, there are concerns regarding the safety and benefit of multiple courses. Nevertheless, many women who present with symptoms of PTB do not deliver early.

Objectives: To assess how often we used corticosteroid appropriately in our clinical practice in women who presented with risk of PTB.

Methods: Clinical data were retrospectively collected on patients who were admitted to our clinic between September 2014 and August 2015 due to risk of PTB and who were treated with prenatal corticosteroids.

Results: We identified 305 patients at risk of PTB who were treated with corticosteroids; 42.3% delivered < week 34, 22.5% delivered between weeks 34 and 37, and 35.1% delivered > 37 weeks. In women who delivered after week 37, the more time that elapsed between corticosteroids administration and delivery, the lower the pH and the APGAR scores were. Only 26% of patients delivered 2–14 days after the last steroids course of treatment.

Conclusions: The rate of term deliveries at our center after receiving antenatal corticosteroids due to prior symptoms of preterm labor was 35.1%. The ratio of maternal antenatal corticosteroid administration for potential versus actual PTB at < 37 weeks of gestation was not optimal but acceptable.

March 2023
Yoav Siegler MD, Chen Ben David MD, Zeev Weiner MD, Ido Solt MD

Late, preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) presents a major obstetrical challenge balancing between iatrogenic prematurity and risk of prolonged rupture of membranes. In recent years, the pendulum has been shifting toward expectant management until gestation week 37 + 0. We examined the latest guidelines and major trials and summarized optimal management. We addressed the major dilemmas of women with PPROM during gestation weeks 34 + 0 to 36 + 6.

September 2020
Naftali Justman MD, Gilad Shahak MD, Ola Gutzeit MD, Dikla Ben Zvi MD, Yuval Ginsberg MD, Ido Solt MD, Dana Vitner MD, Ron Beloosesky MD, Zeev Weiner MD and Yaniv Zipori MD

Background: The World Health Organization classified coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) as a pandemic and recommends strict restrictions regarding most aspects of daily activities.

Objectives: To evaluate whether the pandemic has changed the prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in pregnant women without COVID-19.

Methods: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study to describe changes in outpatient clinic visits and to compare the rates of cesarean and instrumental deliveries between two periods of time: March–April 2020 (during the COVID-19 outbreak) with March–April of the preceding year, 2019.

Results: During the COVID-19 outbreak, visits to obstetric triage, gynecologic triage, high-risk clinic, and ultrasound units decreased by 36.4%, 34.7%, 32.8%, and 18.1%, respectively. The medical center experienced a 17.8% drop in the total number of births (610 births) compared with March and April 2019 (742 births). During the outbreak women were more likely to be nulliparous (33.3% vs. 27.6%, P = 0.02) and present with hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (7.5% vs. 4%, P = 0.005) or gestational diabetes (13% vs. 10%, P = 0.03). More epidural analgesia was used (83.1% vs. 77.1%, P = 0.006). There were more operative vaginal deliveries during the outbreak (16.7% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.01). All other maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two periods.

Conclusions: The medical facility experienced a major decline in all aspects of the routine obstetrics activities during the time of the pandemic. The higher rate of operative vaginal deliveries among nulliparous may be associated with the pandemic effect on the rate of high-risk patients

January 2019
Chen Ben David MD , Zeev Weiner MD and Ido Solt MD

The use of ultrasound endovaginal probes is common practice in the fields of gynecology and obstetrics. The vagina serves as a host environment for many microorganisms, contributing greatly to its defensive mechanisms. It is not known whether the introduction of other microorganisms into the vaginal region are detrimental or require intensive preventative measures. Several national ultrasonography societies, as well as the Israel Ministry of Health, have addressed the proper and adequate handling of sonographic endovaginal probes, including the use of high-level disinfecting agents following cleansing and prior to using probe covers between patients. However, many obstetrics and gynecology ultrasound units in Israel find it difficult to adhere to these strict disinfecting requirements. While most of the guidelines are based on the theoretical risk of contaminations when ultrasound endovaginal probes are used, the rate of nosocomial infections linked to the use of these probes has yet to be verified. Based on the information available, there is an urgent need to find a solution that enables gynecological ultrasound users to properly disinfect endovaginal probes between patients. Currently, it is almost impossible to pragmatically adhere to the Israel Ministry of Health guidelines. 

September 2018
Moshe Bronshtein MD, Ayala Gover MD, Ron Beloosesky MD, Hanin Dabaja MD, Yuval Ginsberg MD, Zeev Weiner MD and Nizar Khatib MD

Background: Ptyalism gravidarum (PG) is a condition of hypersalivation that affects pregnant women early in gestation. Symptoms include massive saliva volumes (up to 2 liters per day), swollen salivary glands, sleep deprivation, significant emotional distress, and social difficulties.

Objectives: To examine maternal and fetal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of patients with PG.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with PG in our clinic during the years 2001–2016 were identified and contacted. Demographic data were extracted from patient charts and clinical and outcome data was collected via telephone interviews.

Results: The incidence of PG was 1/963 (0.09%) in our sample. Eleven out of 22 women (40%) with PG were also diagnosed with hyperemesis gravidarum. Fetal gender did not increase the risk. Of the mothers presenting with PG, 37% had a positive family history for this condition. There was no associated increase in the rate of fetal or maternal complications. Two women reported a resolution of the symptoms immediately following hypnosis with acupuncture treatment.

Conclusions: Although PG represents an unpleasant mental and physical condition, it does not pose any specific risk to the health of the mother or increase adverse perinatal outcomes for the fetus. Alternative medicine could play a role in the treatment of PG.

March 2002
Ido Solt, MD, Sohair Ganadry, MD and Zeev Weiner, MD

Background: Visual interpretation of fetal heart rare monitoring is subject to intra and inter observer variability.

Objective: To examine the effect of intrapartum administration of meperidine and promethazine on fetal heart activity measured by a computerized system.

Methods: Fourteen healthy women with normal pregnancies at term were studied during the active phase of labor. Fetal heart rate was recorded with the Oxford Sonicaid system 8000. Recordings were performed for 40 minutes prior to and after maternal intravenous administration of meperidine 50 mg with promethazine 25 mg.

Results: The combination of meperidine and promethazine caused a significant decrease in the number of accelerations of 10 beats per minute (9.7 versus 2.6, P = 0.002) and 15 beats per minute (5.2 vs. l.4, P = 0.003), time spent in episodes of high variation (14.8 vs. 2.0, P = 0.005) and short-term variation (7.8 vs. 5.0, P = 0.003). On the other hand there was an increase in the time spent in episodes of low variation (5.3 vs. 19.7, P = 0.009).

Conclusions: Maternal administration of meperidine with promethazine has a significant effect on FHR[1] indices during the active phase of normal labor.






[1] FHR = fetal heart rate


Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any matter.
The IMA is not responsible for and expressly disclaims liability for damages of any kind arising from the use of or reliance on information contained within the site.
© All rights to information on this site are reserved and are the property of the Israeli Medical Association. Privacy policy

2 Twin Towers, 35 Jabotinsky, POB 4292, Ramat Gan 5251108 Israel