Israel Medical Association Journal

Standup paddleboard surfing (SUP) is a sports activity in which a person stands upright on a surfboard and propels the board using a single paddle. It is an emerging recreational activity that is attracting public attention and gaining popularity because it promotes fitness, strength, and improved balance. In this review, we discuss the outcomes after severe cardiac events in SUP surfers. We report on six fit individuals (five males and one female, age range 41–69 years) who experienced sudden cardiac arrest (n=3) or acute myocardial infarction occurring during SUP. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated in three patients on presentation due to ventricular fibrillation. In four patients the culprit coronary artery was the left anterior descending artery treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. All patients were discharged alive. A review of the literature showed a paucity of scientific evidence to substantiate the proposed health benefits of SUP surfing. Our cluster of acute cardiac events occurring during this activity calls for heightened public awareness to better understand the physical demand required to practice SUP. There is a need for more data regarding the cardiovascular clinical aspects of this water activity, and the risks it entails.

Background: Trials have shown superiority of primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI) over in-hospital thrombolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated within 6-12 hours from symptom onset. These studies also included high-risk patients not all of whom underwent a therapeutic intervention. 

Objectives: To compare the outcome of early-arriving stable STEMI patients treated by thrombolysis with or without coronary angiography to the outcome of PPCI-treated STEMI patients.

Methods: Based on six biannual Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Surveys comprising 5474 STEMI patients, we analyzed the outcome of 1464 hemodynamically stable STEMI patients treated within 3 hours of onset. Of these, 899 patients underwent PPCI, 383 received in-hospital thrombolysis followed by angiography (TFA), and 182 were treated by thrombolysis only.

Results: Median time intervals from symptom onset to admission were similar while door-to-reperfusion intervals were 63, 45 and 52.5 minutes for PPCI, TFA and thrombolysis only, respectively (P < 0.001). The 30-day composite endpoint of death, post-infarction angina and myocardial infarction occurred in 77 patients of the PPCI group (8.6%), 64 patients treated by TFA (16.7%), and 36 patients of the thrombolysis only group (19.8%, P < 0.001), with differences mostly due to post-infarction angina. One-year mortality rate was 27 (3%), 13 (3.4%) and 11 (6.1%) for PPCI, TFA and thrombolysis only, respectively (P = 0.12).

Conclusions: PPCI was superior to thrombolysis in early-arriving stable STEMI patients with regard to 30-day composite endpoint driven by a decreased incidence of post-infarction angina. No 1 year survival benefit for PPCI over thrombolysis was observed in early-arriving stable STEMI patients.