Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: Diverticulitis is a common cause of acute abdominal conditions, often requiring urgent or elective surgical intervention. Both psoas muscle area (PMA) and bone mineral density (BMD) have been linked to postoperative outcomes, but their role in diverticulitis remains unclear.

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between PMA, BMD, and their combined effect on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing colectomy for diverticulitis.

Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, we analyzed patients who underwent colectomy for diverticulitis. PMA and BMD were measured using preoperative computerized tomography. Statistical analysis assessed the association between postoperative outcomes and PMA, BMD, and their combined product (PMA × BMD).

Results: The cohort included 66 patients; median age 68.5 years (range 34–94); 41 (62.12%) females. Of the cases, 42 (63.63%) were urgent. Postoperative complications occurred in 38 patients (57.58%). Patients who developed major postoperative complications had lower PMA (1116.74 ± 716.31 mm² vs. 1948.01 ± 0.01 mm², P = 0.02). The area under the curve (AUC) for major postoperative complications was 0.94 for BMD. The AUC for postoperative ileus was 0.73, 0.69, and 0.76 for PMA, BMD, and PMA × BMD, respectively. The AUC for 30-day mortality was 0.66, 0.7, and 0.73. The AUC for ostomy reversal was 0.71, 0.71, and 0.76.

Conclusions: PMA and BMD were associated with postoperative complications after colectomy for diverticulitis. Their combined assessment may improve predictive accuracy. Current evidence regarding the impact of body composition on surgical outcomes in diverticulitis remains limited and inconsistent. Further research is warranted.

Background: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak had an effect on healthcare.

Objectives: To evaluate the presentation and management of patients with acute appendicitis.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of all patients presenting with acute appendicitis to the emergency department of a large tertiary center during March and April 2020. Clinical features, diagnostic workup, and management were compared.

Results: Seventy-four patients presented with acute appendicitis during the pandemic compared to 60 patients during the same time the year before. There were no significant differences in patient demographics: age (P = 0.65), gender (P = 0.73), smoking status (P = 0.48). During COVID-19 patients were more likely to complain of right lower quadrant pain (100% vs. 78.3%, P < 0.01). Rates of surgical treatment was similar (83.8% vs. 81.7%, P = 1); mean operative time was longer during COVID-19 (63 ± 23 vs. 52 ± 26 minutes, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in intra-operative findings including the presence of appendiceal perforation (16.3% vs. 14.5%, P = 0.8), abscess (6.1% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.73), or involvement of cecum or terminal ileum (14.28% vs. 19.63%, P = 1). Postoperative treatment with antibiotics was more prevalent during COVID-19 (37.1% vs. 18%, P = 0.04). Length of stay (1.82 ± 2.04 vs. 2.74 ± 4.68, P = 0.2) and readmission rates (6% vs. 11.3%, P =0.51) were similar.

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly affect the presentation, clinical course, management, and outcomes of patients presenting with acute appendicitis.

Background: As part of the effort to control the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) outbreak, strict emergency measures, including prolonged national curfews, have been imposed. Even in countries where healthcare systems still functioned, patients avoided visiting emergency departments (EDs) because of fears of exposure to COVID-19.

Objective: To describe the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak on admissions of surgical patients from the ED and characteristics of urgent operations performed.

Methods: A prospective registry study comparing all patients admitted for acute surgical and trauma care between 15 March and 14 April 2020 (COVID-19) with patients admitted in the parallel time a year previously (control) was conducted.

Results: The combined cohort included 606 patients. There were 25% fewer admissions during the COVID-19 period (P < 0.0001). The COVID-19 cohort had a longer time interval from onset of symptoms (P < 0.001) and presented in a worse clinical condition as expressed by accelerated heart rate (P = 0.023), leukocyte count disturbances (P = 0.005), higher creatinine, and CRP levels (P < 0.001) compared with the control cohort. More COVID-19 patients required urgent surgery (P = 0.03) and length of ED stay was longer (P = 0.003).

Conclusions: During the COVID-19 epidemic, fewer patients presented to the ED requiring acute surgical care. Those who did, often did so in a delayed fashion and in worse clinical condition. More patients required urgent surgical interventions compared to the control period. Governments and healthcare systems should emphasize to the public not to delay seeking medical attention, even in times of crises