• IMA sites
  • IMAJ services
  • IMA journals
  • Follow us
  • Alternate Text Alternate Text
עמוד בית
Fri, 05.12.25

Search results


August 2025
Ronen Toledano MD, Adi Maisel Lotan MD, Hadas Yarimi MD, Yoav Gronovich MD MBA

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine skin tumor with an increasing incidence in Western countries. Predominantly affecting older individuals, MCC represents less than 1% of malignant skin tumors.

Objectives: To characterize the clinical presentation, therapeutic interventions, and follow-up outcomes of MCC patients. To promote heightened clinical awareness regarding the early recognition and diagnosis of MCC.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study analyzing medical records of MCC patients at the Shaare Zedek Medical Center between 2015–2022. From 19 initially identified patients, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Data collection included demographic, epidemiological, clinical, and pathological characteristics.

Results: The study included 17 patients, predominantly of Jewish origin, with a mean age of 70.06 years; 58.8% female. Medical co-morbidities included 64.7% hypertension and 35.3% diabetes. MCC tumors were predominantly left-sided (58.8%), with varied locations including limbs, trunk, and face. Surgical treatment consisted of excision and primary closure (64.7%) or skin grafting (23.5%). The average tumor diameter was 3.41 cm clinically and 3.83 cm pathologically. Lymph node involvement occurred in 29.4% of cases; 23.5% showed metastatic disease at diagnosis, with metastases diffused in different body areas. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no statistically significant differences across most variables, except for a significantly lower survival rate in patients with ischemic heart disease (P = 0.009).

Conclusions: Our study reveals unique characteristics of MCC, predominance of female patients, and a slightly younger average diagnosis age compared to existing literature. The 2-year survival rate in our cohort was 82%. The study underscores the importance of early detection and diagnosis of MCC, thereby enhancing clinical awareness and improving patient outcomes.

November 2022
Yehonatan Sherf MD MPH, Dekel Avital MD, Shahar Geva Robinson MD, Natan Arotsker MD, Liat Waldman Radinsky MD, Efrat Chen Hendel MD MPH, Dana Braiman MD, Ahab Hayadri MD, Dikla Akselrod MD, Tal Schlaeffer-Yosef MD, Yasmeen Abu Fraiha MD, Ronen Toledano MD, Nimrod Maimon MD MHA

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia. Previous studies showed that rhythm and rate control strategies are associated with similar rates of mortality and serious morbidity. Beta blockers (BB) and calcium channel blockers (CCB) are commonly used and the selection between these two medications depends on personal preference.

Objectives: To compare real-time capability of BB and CCB for the treatment of rapid AF and to estimate their efficacy in reducing hospitalization duration.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 306 patients hospitalized at Soroka Hospital during a 5-year period with new onset AF who were treated by a rate control strategy.

Results: A significant difference between the two groups regarding the time (in hours) until reaching a target heart rate below 100 beats/min was observed. BB were found to decrease the heart rate after 5 hours (range 4–14) vs. 8 hours (range 4–18) for CCB (P = 0.009). Patients diagnosed with new-onset AF exhibited shorter duration of hospitalization after therapy with BB compared to CCB (median 72 vs. 96 hours, P = 0.012) in the subgroup of patients discharged with persistent AF. There was no significant difference between CCB and BB regarding the duration of hospitalization (P = 0.4) in the total patient population.

Conclusions: BB therapy is more potent for rapid reduction of the heart rate compared to CCB and demonstrated better efficiency in shortening the duration of hospitalization in a subgroup of patients. This finding should be reevaluated in subsequent research.

Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any matter.
The IMA is not responsible for and expressly disclaims liability for damages of any kind arising from the use of or reliance on information contained within the site.
© All rights to information on this site are reserved and are the property of the Israeli Medical Association. Privacy policy

2 Twin Towers, 35 Jabotinsky, POB 4292, Ramat Gan 5251108 Israel