Israel Medical Association Journal

I read with great interest the comprehensive and interesting paper by Hazzan and colleagues in the Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) [1]. The authors examined the difference in the results between morning and afternoon shifts of colonoscopy procedures. Not to my surprise, they found that more polyps were found in the morning shifts than in those in the afternoon. I believe, as do the authors, that the higher quality of the colonoscopy, the better its efficacy in detecting polyps and preventing colorectal cancer (CRC).

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly occurring cancer worldwide. There are conflicting reports on whether colonoscopies performed during the morning shift have higher adenoma detection rates.

Objectives: To investigate the differences in polyp detection rate (PDR) in colonoscopies between morning and afternoon shifts.

Methods: In a retrospective, multicenter study involving a large cohort, we analyzed all colonoscopies conducted between 2016 and 2023 across seven endoscopy departments. The PDR was compared between morning and afternoon shifts.

Results: We included 368,997 colonoscopies: 213,795 (57.9%) performed during the morning shift and 155,202 (42.1%) during the afternoon shift. Patients undergoing colonoscopies during the morning shift were more frequently female (53.8% vs. 51%, P < 0.001) and tended to be older compared to those in the afternoon shift (average age of 56.97 ± 12.6 vs. 55.6 ± 12.9, P < 0.001). Colonoscopies conducted during the morning shift exhibited a higher cecum intubation rate (CIR) (96.7% vs. 95.6%, P < 0.001). During the morning shift, higher rates of PDR (32.9% vs. 29.9%, P < 0.001) were observed. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for other variables, age, male sex, polyp follow-up, fecal occult blood test, morning shift, familial history of CRC, and rectal bleeding demonstrated statistically significant associations (P < 0.001) for PDR.

Conclusions: Colonoscopies during the morning shift yielded a higher PDR and CIR than those in the afternoon. To improve this rate, endoscopists working the afternoon shift must be provided with the right conditions.

Background: Hepatitis D virus may cause a disease at various severities in the presence of hepatitis B virus, using hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) on the external envelope in its replication process. Thus, people identified with HBsAg in blood tests should also be tested for hepatitis D virus.

Objectives: To describe the situation of performance of blood tests for detection of hepatitis D virus in patients positive for hepatitis surface antigen during 9 years in a population with heterogeneous origins in the north region of Israel.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using the database of Clalit Health Services.

Results: We found 3367 people were positive for HBsAg during the study period; 613 (18%) were tested for hepatitis D. People who tested for hepatitis D were younger (47.3 ± 15 years vs. 50.5) and showed a higher rate of visiting the gastroenterology clinic (80.6% vs. 41%). The rate of positive blood tests for hepatitis D was too small for analysis, but it still demonstrated tendency for higher rates in the Ethiopian Jewish group.

Conclusion: The recommendation for performance of blood test for hepatitis D virus was followed to a small extent. Considering the ethnic diversity of the population in Israel, activities to raise rates of performance should be considered.