Israel Medical Association Journal

I read with great interest the comprehensive and interesting paper by Hazzan and colleagues in the Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) [1]. The authors examined the difference in the results between morning and afternoon shifts of colonoscopy procedures. Not to my surprise, they found that more polyps were found in the morning shifts than in those in the afternoon. I believe, as do the authors, that the higher quality of the colonoscopy, the better its efficacy in detecting polyps and preventing colorectal cancer (CRC).

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly occurring cancer worldwide. There are conflicting reports on whether colonoscopies performed during the morning shift have higher adenoma detection rates.

Objectives: To investigate the differences in polyp detection rate (PDR) in colonoscopies between morning and afternoon shifts.

Methods: In a retrospective, multicenter study involving a large cohort, we analyzed all colonoscopies conducted between 2016 and 2023 across seven endoscopy departments. The PDR was compared between morning and afternoon shifts.

Results: We included 368,997 colonoscopies: 213,795 (57.9%) performed during the morning shift and 155,202 (42.1%) during the afternoon shift. Patients undergoing colonoscopies during the morning shift were more frequently female (53.8% vs. 51%, P < 0.001) and tended to be older compared to those in the afternoon shift (average age of 56.97 ± 12.6 vs. 55.6 ± 12.9, P < 0.001). Colonoscopies conducted during the morning shift exhibited a higher cecum intubation rate (CIR) (96.7% vs. 95.6%, P < 0.001). During the morning shift, higher rates of PDR (32.9% vs. 29.9%, P < 0.001) were observed. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for other variables, age, male sex, polyp follow-up, fecal occult blood test, morning shift, familial history of CRC, and rectal bleeding demonstrated statistically significant associations (P < 0.001) for PDR.

Conclusions: Colonoscopies during the morning shift yielded a higher PDR and CIR than those in the afternoon. To improve this rate, endoscopists working the afternoon shift must be provided with the right conditions.

Background: Polyp detection rate (PDR) is a convenient quality measure indicator. Many factors influence PDR, including the patient's background, age, referral (ambulatory or hospitalized), and bowel cleansing.

Objectives: To evaluate whether years of professional experience have any effect on PDR.

Methods: A multivariate analysis of a retrospective cohort was performed, where both patient- and examiner-related variables, including the experience of doctors and nurses, were evaluated. PDR, as the dependent variable was calculated separately for all (APDR), proximal (PPDR), and small (SPDR) polyps.

Results: Between 1998 and 2019, 20,996 patients underwent colonoscopy at a single center. After controlling for covariates, the experience of both doctors and nurses was not found to be associated with APDR (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.98–1.00, P = 0.15 and OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.02–1.04, P < 0.0001, respectively). However, after 2.4 years of colonoscopy experience for doctors, and 9.5 years of experience for nurses, a significant increase in APDR was observed. Furthermore, results revealed no association for PPDR and SPDR, as well.

Conclusions: Years of colonoscopy experience for both doctors and assisting nurses were not associated with APDR, PPDR, and SPDR. In doctors with 2.4 years of experience and nurses with 9.5 years of experience, a significant increase in APDR was observed.