Israel Medical Association Journal

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), driven by autoantibodies targeting platelet antigens, is an acquired disorder posing considerable challenges, particularly in pregnancy, where its prevalence escalates to 1–3 per 10,000 women, a tenfold increase compared to the general population [1]. Predominantly characterized by a heightened risk of bleeding, particularly during pregnancy, the incidence of significant hemorrhagic events stands at approximately 18%, mostly non-severe [1]. Despite its rarity, thrombosis can manifest as a complication, especially when accompanied by antiphospholipid antibodies, which amplify the propensity for arterial and venous thrombotic events alongside obstetric complications and thrombocytopenia [2,3].

In this case report, we present the case of a young female with primary unexplained infertility, complicated by ITP and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), predisposing her to increased bleeding and thrombotic risks. During a multidisciplinary consultation, the medical staff navigated the intricate landscape of fertility treatments and pregnancy options, carefully considering the delicate balance between risks and benefits to optimize patient outcomes.

Background: Pregnant women with Marfan syndrome (MS) have a high risk of aortic dissection around delivery and their optimal management requires a multi-disciplinary approach, including proper cardio-obstetric care and adequate pain management during labor, which may be difficult due to the high prevalence of dural ectasia (DE) in these patients.

Objectives: To evaluate the multidisciplinary management of MS patients during labor.

Methods: Nineteen pregnant women (31 pregnancies) with MS were followed by a multi-disciplinary team (cardiologist, obstetrician, anesthesiologist) prior to delivery.

Results:^. Two patients had kyphoscoliosis; none had previous spine surgery nor complaints compatible with DE. In eight pregnancies (7 patients), aortic root diameter (ARd) before pregnancy was 40 to 46 mm. In this high-risk group, one patient underwent elective termination, two underwent an urgent cesarean section (CS) under general anesthesia, and five had elective CS; two under general anesthesia (GA), and three under spinal anesthesia. In 23 pregnancies (12 patients), ARd was < 40 mm. In this non-high-risk group three pregnancies (1 patient) were electively terminated. Of the remaining 20 deliveries (11 patients), 14 were vaginal deliveries, 9 with epidural analgesia and 5 without. Six patients had a CS; four under GA and two2 under spinal anesthesia. There were no epidural placement failures and no failed responses. There were 2 cases of aortic dissection, unrelated to the anesthetic management.

Conclusions: The optimal anesthetic strategy during labor in MS patients should be decided by a multi-disciplinary team. Anesthetic complications due to DE were not encountered during neuraxial block