Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: High prevalence of hepatitis C (HCV) among people with severe mental illness (SMI) is attributed mostly to current or past intravenous (IV) drug use. However, such history may disappear from patient files over time, especially in chronic SMI with prolonged psychiatric admissions.

Objectives: To explore HCV and SMI cross-morbidity (HCV/SMI) in a hospitalized population.

Methods: In this observational, retrospective, historical computerized study we examined prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients with HCV/SMI compared to HCV alone in patients admitted to an Israeli hospital 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2020.

Results: Of 1638 eligible HCV patients, 219 (13.4%) were HCV/SMI. Significantly more native Israelis showed HCV/SMI than HCV alone (36.1% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.013) and history of IV drug use (60.3% vs. 32.4%, P < 0.001). Among Israeli natives, more Jews were SMI/HCV compared to HCV only (67.1% vs. 45%, P < 0.01). Among non-native Israelis, immigration age was lower in SMI/HCV compared to HCV only (27.97 vs. 37.23 years, P < 0.001). No differences were found in mortality or cirrhosis, although HCV/SMI patients experienced earlier mortality compared to HCV alone (61.42 ± 14.3 vs. 72.8 ± 14.6 years, P < 0.001). Cirrhosis among HCV/SMI patients was a risk factor for early mortality (hazard ratio 5.528, 95% confidence interval 3.721–8.213).

Conclusions: HCV/SMI is related to early mortality, particularly with cirrhosis. There is significantly high SMI prevalence in hospitalized HCV patients, representing a unique at-risk population. Identification during hospitalization and medical recommendations at discharge may fill the gaps.

Background: Inserting a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt by means of interventional radiology has become the procedure of choice for decompression of portal hypertension. The indications and criteria for patient selection have been expanded and refined accordingly.

Objectives: To review our experience with TIPS[1] and analyze the results with emphasis on patient selection and indication (conventional vs. atypical).

Methods: In this retrospective analysis in a single center all cases were managed by a multidisciplinary team (comprising liver surgery and transplantation, hepatology, imaging, interventional radiology and intensive care).

Results: Between August 2003 and December 2009, 34 patients (mean age 51, range 27–76 years) were treated with TIPS. The cause of portal hypertension was cirrhosis (23 cases), hypercoagulabilty complicated by Budd-Chiari syndrome (n=6), and acute portal vein thrombosis (n=5). Clinical indications for TIPS included treatment or secondary prevention of variceal bleeding (10 cases), refractory ascites (n=18), mesenteric ischemia due to acute portal vein thrombosis (n=5), and acute liver failure (n=1). TIPS was urgent in 18 cases (53%) and elective in 16. Three deaths occurred following urgent TIPS. The overall related complication rate was 32%: transient encephalopathy (6 cases), ischemic hepatitis (n=2), acute renal failure (n=2) and bleeding (n=1). Long-term results of TIPS were defined as good in 25 cases (73%), fair in 4 (12%) and failure in 5 (15%). In three of five patients with mesenteric ischemia following acute portal vein thrombosis, surgery was obviated. Revision of TIPS due to stenosis or thrombosis was needed in 7 cases (20%).

Conclusions: TIPS is safe and effective. While its benefit for patients with portal hypertension is clear, the role of TIPS in treatment of portal-mesenteric venous thrombosis needs further evaluation. Patient selection, establishing the indication and performing TIPS should be done by a multidisciplinary dedicated team.