Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommends a ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) of less than 70% (FEV1/FVC < 0.7) after bronchodilators as the criteria for obstruction. However, because the FEV1/FVC ratio decreases with age, using a fixed ratio may lead to overdiagnosis of obstruction in the geriatric population. Using the lower limit of normal (LLN) as threshold for obstruction has been suggested.

Objectives: To determine the rate of overdiagnosis using the GOLD criteria compared to LLN in patients aged 60 and older. To find a better threshold with a minimal rate of over- and underdiagnosis.

Methods: The study population included adults aged 60 years and older who performed pulmonary function test (PFT) at Shaare Zedek Medical Center between 2014 and 2019 with results of FEV1/FVC < 0.7.

Results: We included 430 patients aged 60 years and older, 273 males (63.5%) and 157 females (36.5%). Mean age was 72 ± 8 years. Overdiagnosis was found in 35.6% of patients (95% confidence interval 31.1–40.3%) by using the GOLD criteria compared to the LLN. Overdiagnosis was reduced to 6.4% with the 0.65 threshold. The ideal point of the FEV1/FVC ratio where overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis were at their lowest rates was 0.638.

Conclusions: Use of the GOLD criteria for airflow obstruction may be associated with an overdiagnosis of more than 35% in patients older than 60 years. Lowering the FEV1/FVC ratio to < 0.65 might be more accurate in this population.

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation has shown significant benefit for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The effect on non-COPD pulmonary patients is less well established.

Objectives: To determine whether pulmonary rehabilitation is also beneficial for non-COPD pulmonary patients.

Methods: Clinical and demographic data on non-COPD pulmonary patients who participated in our institutional pulmonary rehabilitation program between January 2009 and December 2016 were collected. Participants engaged in a 60-minute, twice-weekly, ambulatory hospital-based program lasting 12 to 24 sessions. Sessions included both endurance and muscle training as well as healthy lifestyle educational activities. The six-minute walk test (6MWT) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were conducted before and after the rehabilitation program.

Result: We recruited 214 non-COPD patients, of whom 153 completed at least 12 sessions. Of these, 59 presented with interstitial lung disease (ILD), 18 with non-ILD restrictive lung defects, 25 with asthma, 30 with lung cancer, and 21 with other conditions (e.g., pulmonary hypertension, bronchiectasis) The groups demonstrated significant improvement in 6MWT and in SGRQ scores. Non-COPD patients gained a 61.9 meter (19%) improvement in the 6MWT (P < 0.0001) and 8.3 point reduction in their SGRQ score (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Pulmonary rehabilitation is effective in non-COPD pulmonary patients. As such, it should be an integral part of the treatment armament provided to the vast majority of those suffering from chronic respiratory disease.