Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: Uninterrupted antithrombotic treatment (ATT) during cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation increases bleeding and device-related infections (DRI) risk. The wide-awake-local-anesthesia-no-tourniquet (WALANT) technique, using large-volume local anesthesia and adrenaline, is successful in hand surgeries but its potential to mitigate bleeding risk in CIED implantations remains unknown.

Objectives: To investigate whether WALANT protocol for CIED implantations reduces clinically significant pocket hematoma in patients with a high bleeding risk or is a contraindication for interrupting ATT.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial with CIED surgery patients on uninterrupted ATT. They received WALANT protocol (lidocaine 1% with adrenaline 1:100,000) or standard protocol (lidocaine 1%). Following implantation, patients were blindly monitored in the ward and pacemaker clinic. Patients were monitored for bleeding outcomes post-implantation.

Results: Forty-six consecutive patients (73.6 ± 9 years, 72% male) were enrolled. In the WALANT group (n=24) no intra-pocket pro-hemostatic agents were needed, compared to 45% in the control group (P = 0.0002). Postoperative pressure dressings were used in 12.5% vs. 68% (P = 0.0002). WALANT patients had smaller hematoma areas (median 3.7 cm² IQR [1–39] vs. 46 cm² [IQR 24–76], P = 0.0004) 1-day postoperative. ATT interruption occurred in 12.5% vs. 18% (P = 0.7). Superficial skin infection rates were 4% vs. 9% (P = 0.6). No DRI occurred. No WALANT-related side effects were observed.

Conclusions: WALANT protocol in CIED implantation with uninterrupted ATT reduced pro-hemostatic agents, pressure-dressing need, and hematoma size. Larger studies are needed to assess its impact on infection rates.

Background: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are associated with risks of device-related infections (DRI) impacting major adverse outcomes. Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is a leading cause of early pocket infection and bacteremia. While studies in other surgical contexts have suggested that nasal mupirocin treatment and chlorhexidine skin washing may reduce colonization and infection risk, limited data exist for CIED interventions.

Objectives: To assess the impact of SA decolonization on DRI rates.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center observational study on consecutive patients undergoing CIED interventions (March 2020–March 2022). All patients received pre-procedure antibiotics and chlorhexidine skin washing. Starting in March 2021, additional pre-treatment with mupirocin for SA decolonization was administered. DRI rates within 6 months post-implantation were compared between patients treated according to guidelines (Group 1) and those receiving mupirocin in addition to the recommended guidelines (Group 2).

Results: The study comprised 276 patients (age 77 ± 10 years; 60% male). DRI occurred in five patients (1.8%);80% underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy procedures. In Group 1 (n=177), four patients (2.2%) experienced DRI 11–48 days post-procedure; three with pocket infection (two with negative cultures and one with local Pseudomonas) and one with methicillin-sensitive SA endocarditis necessitating device extraction. In Group 2 (n=99), only one patient (1%) had DRI (Strep. dysgalactiae endocarditis) 135 days post-procedure (P = NS).

Conclusions: The routine decolonization of SA with mupirocin, in addition to guideline-directed protocols, did not significantly affect DRI rates. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate the preventive role of routine SA decolonization in CIED procedures.