• IMA sites
  • IMAJ services
  • IMA journals
  • Follow us
  • Alternate Text Alternate Text
עמוד בית
Tue, 27.01.26

Search results


January 2026
Or Segev MD, Alexander Yelak MD, Dennis Scolnik MB ChB, Ayelet Rimon MD, Miguel M. Glatstein MD

Background: Flumazenil has been available since 1991 for the treatment of acute benzodiazepine overdose, yet many physicians remain reluctant to use it.

Objectives: To evaluate the frequency of flumazenil use for benzodiazepine overdose at a large, urban, tertiary care center. To assess its effectiveness and associated adverse events.

Methods: The study was conducted in an emergency department with approximately 220,000 annual visits. Medical records of patients who received a medical toxicology consultation and were treated with flumazenil between 1 January 2019, and 31 December 2023 were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, medical history, substances involved, presence of seizures, indications for flumazenil use, clinical response, and adverse effects.

Results: Of 263 patients evaluated for suspected benzodiazepine overdose and referred to medical toxicology, 79 received flumazenil and comprised the study cohort. Among them, 64 cases involved intentional overdose. Indications for flumazenil administration included severe overdose with impaired consciousness and ventilatory failure (37 patients) or without ventilatory failure (42 patients). Co-ingestion of tricyclic antidepressants was documented in 4 patients and other antidepressants or antipsychotics in 35. Clinical improvement, including enhanced consciousness and/or reduced need for mechanical ventilation, was observed in all 79 patients. No adverse effects, including seizures, were reported.

Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort, flumazenil was administered without serious adverse events and was associated with improved alertness and ventilation. While caution is required, particularly in mixed overdoses, flumazenil may have a role in managing benzodiazepine-induced respiratory depression when guided by toxicology consultation.

October 2024
Or Segev MD, Christopher Hoyte MD, Nicole Taylor MD, Amanda Katz MD, Dennis Scolnik MB ChB, Efrat Zandberg MD, Eyal Hassoun MD, Miguel Glatstein MD

Background: Clinical toxicology is not a certified specialty in Israel, consequently there are a limited number of toxicologists and toxicology services available for consultation.

Objectives: To establish a medical toxicology consultation service focusing on bedside consultations, which had not previously been available in Israel.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective chart review of toxicology consults was conducted during the first years after the initiation of a new toxicology service.

Results: From September 2017 to December 2021, 1703 toxicology consultations were conducted. The most common exposures and reasons for consultation included psychotropic medications (427, 23%), analgesics and anti-inflammatory medications (353, 19%), household products (312, 17%), substances of abuse (240, 13%), and natural toxins (142, 8%). Bedside medical toxicology consultations were performed in 1036 cases (62%) during daytime and night shifts. The number of consultation requests increased steadily over the study period.

Conclusions: The new toxicology service led to a significant change in the institution’s approach to toxicological patients. A bedside toxicology service could help reduce the healthcare burden on national poison centers and can offer readily available, personalized, medical toxicology care.

January 2024
Or Segev MD, Sivan Yochpaz MD, Dennis Scolnik MB ChB, Efrat Zandberg MD, Christopher Hoyte MD, Ayelet Rimon MD, Miguel Glatstein MD

Background: Presentation of intoxicated patients to hospitals is frequent, varied, and increasing. Medical toxicology expertise could lead to important changes in diagnosis and treatment, especially in patients presenting with altered mental status.

Objectives: To describe and analyze clinical scenarios during a 1-year period after the establishment of a medical toxicology consultation service (MTCS).

Methods: Cases of 10 patients with altered mental status at presentation were evaluated. Medical toxicology consultation suggested major and significant changes in diagnosis and management.

Results: Of 973 toxicology consultations performed during the study period, bedside consultation was provided for 413 (42%) patients. Of these 413, 88 (21%) presented with some level of altered mental status. We described 10 patients in whom medical toxicology consultation brought about major and significant changes in diagnosis and management.

Conclusions: Benefits may be derived from medical toxicology consultations, especially in patients with altered mental status. Medical toxicology specialists are well positioned to provide high value and expedited patient care.

Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any matter.
The IMA is not responsible for and expressly disclaims liability for damages of any kind arising from the use of or reliance on information contained within the site.
© All rights to information on this site are reserved and are the property of the Israeli Medical Association. Privacy policy

2 Twin Towers, 35 Jabotinsky, POB 4292, Ramat Gan 5251108 Israel