Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly occurring cancer worldwide. There are conflicting reports on whether colonoscopies performed during the morning shift have higher adenoma detection rates.

Objectives: To investigate the differences in polyp detection rate (PDR) in colonoscopies between morning and afternoon shifts.

Methods: In a retrospective, multicenter study involving a large cohort, we analyzed all colonoscopies conducted between 2016 and 2023 across seven endoscopy departments. The PDR was compared between morning and afternoon shifts.

Results: We included 368,997 colonoscopies: 213,795 (57.9%) performed during the morning shift and 155,202 (42.1%) during the afternoon shift. Patients undergoing colonoscopies during the morning shift were more frequently female (53.8% vs. 51%, P < 0.001) and tended to be older compared to those in the afternoon shift (average age of 56.97 ± 12.6 vs. 55.6 ± 12.9, P < 0.001). Colonoscopies conducted during the morning shift exhibited a higher cecum intubation rate (CIR) (96.7% vs. 95.6%, P < 0.001). During the morning shift, higher rates of PDR (32.9% vs. 29.9%, P < 0.001) were observed. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for other variables, age, male sex, polyp follow-up, fecal occult blood test, morning shift, familial history of CRC, and rectal bleeding demonstrated statistically significant associations (P < 0.001) for PDR.

Conclusions: Colonoscopies during the morning shift yielded a higher PDR and CIR than those in the afternoon. To improve this rate, endoscopists working the afternoon shift must be provided with the right conditions.

Background: During the past 6 years the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IDF-MC) deployed three humanitarian delegation field hospitals (HDFHs) in disaster zones around the globe: Haiti (2010), the Philippines (2013), and Nepal (2015). 

Objectives: To compare the activity of these HDFHs and the characteristics of the patients they served.

Methods: This retrospective study was based on the HDFHs’ operation logs and patients medical records. The study population included both the staff who participated and the patients who were treated in any of the three HDFHs.

Results: The Philippine HDFH was a "hybrid" type, i.e., it was integrated with a local hospital. Both the Haitian and the Nepali HDFHs were the "stand-alone" type, i.e., were completely autonomic in resources and in function. The Nepali HDFH had a larger staff, departed from Israel 4 hours earlier and was active 7 hours earlier as compared to the Haitian one. In total, 5465 patients, 55% of them female, were treated in the three HDFHs. In Haiti, Nepal and the Philippines, disaster-related injuries accounted for 66%, 26% and 2% of the cases, respectively. Disaster-related injuries presented mainly in the first days of the HDFHs' activity.

Conclusions: The next HDFH should be planned to care for a significant proportion of routine medical illnesses. The IDF-MC continuous learning process will enable future HDFHs to save more lives as we "extend a helping hand" to foreign populations in crisis.