Summary

The Holocaust represents an extreme failure of medical ethics, with physicians actively involved in crimes against humanity. Rheumatology is directly affected through eponyms that honor Nazi perpetrators and through persistent musculoskeletal consequences observed in Holocaust survivors. In this article, we critically analyzed symbolic (nomenclature) and biological (trauma-related disability) legacies of Nazism in rheumatology. Narrative reviews of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) as well as key historiographic analyses and clinical studies of musculoskeletal outcomes among Holocaust survivors were included. Ethical codes emerging post-Holocaust (Nuremberg Code and Declaration of Helsinki) were integrated. Renaming Reiter’s syndrome as reactive arthritis and Wegener’s granulomatosis as granulomatosis with polyangiitis represents ethical correction. Clinical evidence shows Holocaust survivors experience such as reduced functional recovery after hip fracture, lower perceived health despite similar objective measures, and greater cardiovascular burden impairing rehabilitation tolerance. Rheumatology must align nomenclature with ethical responsibility and recognize trauma-associated musculoskeletal vulnerability. Historical memory should guide clinical decisions, language, and education