• IMA sites
  • IMAJ services
  • IMA journals
  • Follow us
  • Alternate Text Alternate Text
עמוד בית
Sun, 21.07.24

Original Articles

IMAJ | volume 21

Journal 5, May 2019
pages: 314-317

Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatology – Four Theoretical Cases and Three Monotheistic Approaches: A Pilot Study



: Israel's population is diverse, with people of different religions, many of whom seek spiritual guidance during ethical dilemmas. It is paramount for healthcare providers to be familiar with different religious approaches.


To describe the attitudes of the three major monotheistic religions when encountering four complex neonatal situations.


A questionnaire related to four simulated cases was presented to each participant: a non-viable extremely premature infant (case 1), a severely asphyxiated term infant with extensive brain damage (case 2), a small preterm infant with severe brain hemorrhage and likely extensive brain damage (case 3), and a term infant with trisomy 21 syndrome and a severe cardiac malformation (case 4).


Major differences among the three religious opinions were found in the definition of viability and in the approach towards quality of life.


Neonatologists must be sensitive to culture and religion when dealing with major ethical issues in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any matter.
The IMA is not responsible for and expressly disclaims liability for damages of any kind arising from the use of or reliance on information contained within the site.
© All rights to information on this site are reserved and are the property of the Israeli Medical Association. Privacy policy

2 Twin Towers, 35 Jabotinsky, POB 4292, Ramat Gan 5251108 Israel