תוצאת חיפוש

Postoperative Pain Relief

Rinat Elimelech, Elon Eisenberg, Michael Doitch

Pain Relief Clinic, Rambam Medical Center, The Technion, Haifa

The traditional approach to postoperative pain relief (POPR) is still in effect in many surgical departments in Israel: morphine or meperidine given IM "on demand." In spite of the availability of modern and more effective approaches for POPR, their utilization in hospitals in Israel is lagging. The aim of this project was to study how POPR is being performed in a randomly chosen academic gynecological department, with the assumption that increased awareness will facilitate the necessary changes needed to improve POPR.

Four aspects of POPR were studied in 60 female subjects who underwent elective hysterectomy: patients' attitudes to postoperative pain and its relief ascertained prior to surgery; analgesics, prescribed and delivered; assessment of postoperative pain; and patients' satisfaction with POPR.

Results show that patients' fear of postoperative pain is the largest component of their overall fear of the surgical procedure. Although they anticipate intense pain, and expect significant POPR, most women prefer not to receive opioid analgesics. Most patients received an average of 10-20 mg of morphine during the first 2 postoperative days. They reported at least moderate to severe pain on 5 of 6 measurements during that period. Nevertheless, most patients were satisfied with their POPR. It is likely that patients expressed a high level of satisfaction primarily due to their low-level of expectations. Assuming that these results represent the POPR situation nationwide, practical steps should be undertaken for its improvement.

Parturient Compliance in Intra-Partum Epidural Analgesia

Eyal Sheiner, Ilana Shoham-Vardi, Moshe Mazor, Reli Hershkowitz, Miriam Katz

Obstetrics and Gynecology Depts., and Epidemiology and Health Services Evaluation Dept., Soroka Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba

The relationship between parturients' sociodemographic characteristics and the tendency of the medical staff to offer and of the parturients to accept intrapartum epidural analgesia, was investigated. 97 Jewish parturients were interviewed during January 1996. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the results. 10 parturients (10.3%) asked for intrapartum epidural analgesia, and while 46 (47.4%) were offered it, only 22 (22.7%) accepted. Epidural analgesia was mostly offered to, and accepted by: low birth-order parturients (1st-3rd delivery), those belonging to the upper middle class, and to parturients with higher compliance with prenatal diagnostic tests. There was no significant association between the tendency of the medical staff to offer epidural analgesia to secular as compared to traditional parturients.

We conclude that the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia is related to various maternal sociodemographic characteristics. If the low compliance with epidural analgesia is related to prejudice and unfounded fears, we recommend that the benefits of this type of analgesia be explained before birth in the antenatal clinics.

Intravenous Lignocaine for Chronic Pain

Alex Cahana, Victor Shvelzon, Orit Dolberg, Florella Magora, Yoram Shir

Pain Treatment Services, Depts. of Anesthesiology of Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer and of Hadassah-University Hospital, Jerusalem

Intravenous injection of lignocaine relieves pain in animals with experimentally induced pain, and in man, mainly those with neuropathic pain. 106 patients were treated with intravenous lignocaine during a period of 18 months (212 treatment sessions). Blood pressure, heart rate and pain scores were continuously monitored after an intravenous bolus of lignocaine, 1 mg/kg, followed by continuous infusion of lignocaine, 5 mg/kg during 1 hour. There was significant pain relief after each session in most patients, lasting from a few hours to 4 weeks. There were no significant side effects. We present 2 of our patients. Due to its simplicity, efficacy and safety, intravenous lignocaine injection is recommended for those with neuropathic pain unrelieved by other therapeutic modalities.

An In-Hospital Pain Service: Present Activity and Future Trends

Y. Shir, V. Shavelzon, G. Rosen, S. Cotev

Anesthesia Dept. and Intensive Care Unit, Hadassah Hospital, Jerusalem

Although significant progress has been made in the past 2 decades in our understanding of pain pathophysiology and in the development of new analgesic drugs and techniques, many patients still experience considerable pain during hospitalization. Unrelieved pain is common not only among patients undergoing surgery, but also in those with a variety of other medical problems. These findings led to the development of our in-hospital acute pain service. This in-hospital pain service has been active since the late eighties, treating both postoperative pain and non-surgical pain in hospitalized patients. During 1995, 2140 patients were treated totaling 8717 treatment days in 18 different medical units and departments. Overall success was more than 75%. We review our experience in treating in-patients who suffer from pain and discuss future trends and need for such a specialized service.