Israel Medical Association Journal

Nail psoriasis (NP) is a common manifestation of psoriasis, affecting up to 80–90% of patients with psoriatic arthritis and up to 60% of those with cutaneous psoriasis. Isolated NP also occurs in 5–10% of cases. It significantly impacts quality of life and may indicate or precede psoriatic arthritis. In this review, we summarized the clinical features of NP, highlighting patterns of matrix and nail bed involvement, and discussed differential diagnosis with onychomycosis. We outlined current topical, intralesional, systemic, and non-pharmacological treatment options, and proposed an evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management.

Psoriasis is a chronic immuno-inflammatory skin disorder characterized by rapid keratinocyte proliferation, forming thick, red patches with silvery scales. It affects 2–3% of the population, impacting skin, nails, and joints. Pathogenesis involves genetic, environmental, and immunological factors [1]. Triggers such as infections (especially Streptococcus), skin injuries, medications, stress, and alcohol can initiate or worsen the condition [1]. Psoriasis may follow a stable course or present in cycles of flare-ups and remissions. Skin involvement may manifest in any body area but is most common on the knees, elbows, trunk, and scalp [1]. Nail involvement appears in up to 60% of those with cutaneous psoriasis and 80% of those with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), with an 80–90% lifetime incidence [2,3]. Isolated nail psoriasis (NP), defined as nail changes without cutaneous psoriasis or with limited body surface involvement (< 5%), occurs in 5–10% of patients [4,5].

Background: In recent years there has been an increase in endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. In cases of insufficient neck length, occlusion of left subclavian artery achieves proper sealing and is usually well tolerated. Selected cases require revascularization of the left subclavian artery, including patients after coronary bypass surgery (left internal mammary to left anterior descending) and those with arm claudication or subclavian steal syndrome.

Objectives: To evaluate the tolerability of left subclavian artery occlusion by stent graft without revascularization.

Methods: Thirty patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms underwent endovascular repair between July 2000 and November 2004. Eleven of them had occlusion of the left subclavian artery that required revascularization in two. Follow-up (average 3 years) included a) blood pressure measurements of both arms at rest, after effort and pulse palpation, and b) vertebral blood flow by duplex scan.

Results: Of nine patients with no revascularization, 8 (89%) tolerated left subclavian artery occlusion with no claudication or steal syndrome; one (11%) suffered mild claudication only after effort and required no intervention. No left radial pulses were palpated in the nine patients. Blood pressure measurements in the left arm showed an average decrease of 40%, which remained constant after induced effort in all patients and was clinically insignificant. Duplex scan demonstrated reverse flow in the left vertebral artery in 8 of 9 patients (89%) and occlusion in 1 (originating in the arch and covered by the stent graft) with no clinical symptoms.

Conclusions: Left subclavian artery occlusion by stent graft is a tolerable procedure in the long term. In most cases, the constant decrease in blood pressure remained unchanged during follow-up and had no significant adverse affects. Most patients do not require revascularization prior to the endovascular procedure.